Public Policy – Research Co.

Perceptions on National Economy Mostly Stagnant in Canada

February 26, 2026February 25, 2026By Mario Canseco

Canadians are more likely to trust Mark Carney on economic matters than Pierre Poilievre.

Vancouver, BC [February 26, 2026] – The views of Canadians on the country’s financial standing did not go through severe fluctuations over the past five months, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 60% of Canadians rate the economic conditions in Canada as “poor” or “very poor”, down two points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2025.

More than a third of Canadians (35%, =) continue to say the country’s financial standing is “very good” or “good” today.

Just under a third of residents of Saskatchewan and Manitoba (32%, -8) and Atlantic Canada (32%, -17) say Canada’s economic conditions are “very good” or “good”. The proportions are higher in Ontario (33%, -3), British Columbia (34%, +5), Alberta (36%, +8) and Quebec (38%, -5).

Just over two-in-five Canadians (41%, +2) expect no changes to Canada’s financial standing over the next six months. More than a third (35%, -4) predict a decline, while 15% (=) foresee an improvement.

As was the case in September 2025, similar proportions of Canadians describe their own personal finances as “very good” or “good” (49%, -1) or “poor” or “very poor” (46%, -1).

“There is a significant gender gap when Canadians ponder their personal finances,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “While 58% of Canadian men feel their current situation is positive, only 41% of women concur.”

Just under two-in-five Canadians (38%, -2) express confidence in Governor of the Bank of Canada Tiff Macklem to do the right thing to help the economy.

More than half of Canadians (53%, -5) trust Prime Minister Mark Carney on economic matters—a proportion that rises to 59% among Canadians aged 55 and over, 59% in Quebec and 57% in British Columbia.

Two-in-five Canadians (40%, -4) trust federal opposition leader Pierre Poilievre to do the right thing to help the economy. Poilievre’s numbers are higher in Alberta (44%) and among Canadians aged 18-to-34 (also 44%).

Three-in-four Canadians (75%, -1) believe the price of a week’s worth of groceries will go up in the next six months. Majorities feel the same way when assessing the costs of a new car (65%, -3) and gasoline (57%, -10).

Fewer Canadians believe they will have to pay more for a new television set (50%, -5) or real estate (48%, -4) in the next six months.

There is stability on the question about financial setbacks, with almost half of Canadians saying they have worried “frequently” or “occasionally” in the past couple of months about the safety of their savings (48%, -2) and the value of their investments (also 48%, -1).

Fewer Canadians have been concerned about being able to pay their mortgage or rent (42%, +3), unemployment affecting their household (40%, +1) or their employer running into serious financial trouble (33%, +1).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from February 11 to February 13, 2026, among a representative sample of 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Endorse Specific Actions to Curb Extortion

February 19, 2026February 18, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than half of the province’s residents are following news related to this issue “very closely” or “moderately closely”.

Vancouver, BC [February 19, 2026] – Residents of British Columbia are paying attention to the recent surge of extortion attempts and extortion-related shootings, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than half of British Columbians (56%) have followed news related to this issue “very closely” or “moderately closely” over the past month.

British Columbians of South Asian descent are more likely to be focused on news related to extortion (67%) than residents whose heritage is Indigenous (59%), European (56%) or East Asian (55%).

At least two thirds of British Columbians are in favour of three separate measures to curb extortion in the province.

Four-in-five British Columbians (80%) agree with expediting the removal of non-citizens charged or convicted of extortion, firearms offences, or participation in extortion-related criminal activity.

Sizeable majorities of British Columbians who voted for the Conservative Party of BC (87%) or the BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (85%) in the 2024 provincial election endorse the plan to expedite the removal of charged non-citizens, along with 73% of those who voted for the BC Green Party.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (72%) support amending the Criminal Code so that adolescents who are recruited to carry out extortion-related activities (such as intimidation and threats) can be tried as adults.

“An extortion-related amendment to the Criminal Code is welcomed by 83% of British Columbians aged 55 and over,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities of residents aged 35-to-54 (69%) and aged 18-to-34 (61%) are also supportive.”

Two thirds of British Columbians (66%) back the appointment of a Commissioner for Extortion Violence Against Canadians—a proportion that rises to 70% among respondents of South Asian descent.

British Columbians are deeply divided when assessing two other proposals.

The notion of providing the City of Surrey with its own dedicated police helicopter is regarded positively by 41% of British Columbians and negatively by 38%.

More than two-in-five British Columbians (45%) disagree with changing gun laws, so that people whose homes or businesses are targeted can defend themselves. A slightly smaller proportion (41%) agree with this idea.

Support for changing gun laws due to extortion attempts and extortion-related shootings is highest in Northen BC (51%), followed by Vancouver Island (48%), the Fraser Valley (47%), Southern BC (40%) and Metro Vancouver (also 40%).

British Columbians who voted for the BC NDP in 2024 are less likely to support changing existing gun laws (40%) than those who cast ballots for candidates representing the BC Conservatives or the BC Greens (each at 45%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from February 7 to February 9, 2026, among 802 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians Now Expect the Worst from American Tariffs

February 16, 2026February 15, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than half of Canadians are still endeavouring to avoid purchasing goods from the United States.

Vancouver, BC [February 16, 2026] – The perceptions of Canadians on the reach of the tariffs implemented by the United States has shifted dramatically over the past nine months, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, more than two-in-five Canadians (46%, +19) think the tariffs on Canadian products will be expanded by the U.S. government—a 19-point increase since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in May 2025.

Conversely, the proportion of Canadians who believe the tariffs will be rescinded by the U.S. government fell to 20% (-20).

Two thirds of Canadians (66%, -3) are following news related to the tariffs dispute “very closely” or “moderately closely”.

More than half of Canadians (55%, -5) have avoided purchasing goods originated from the United States, if a non-American alternative was available.

Just over a third of Canadians (34%, -1) have cancelled a planned trip to the United States, while fewer have steered clear of American restaurant franchises in Canada (30%, -6) or shunned American entertainment options (25%, -5).

Just over three-in-four Canadians (76%) think the American tariffs are still a threat to Canada, and more than half (53%) consider the United States a military threat to Canada at this point.

“Majorities of Canadians aged 18-to-34 (56%) and aged 35-to-54 (54%) think the United States currently represents a military threat,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportion is lower among Canadians aged 55 and over (47%).”

Fewer than half of Canadians who voted for the Conservative Party in last year’s federal election (46%) believe the U.S. is a military threat. The proportion rises to 60% among Liberal Party voters and to 68% among New Democratic Party (NDP) voters.

Most Canadians (57%, -7) approve of the way Prime Minister Mark Carney has dealt with the tariffs, while three-in-ten (30%, -9) feel the same way about Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre.

More than half of Canadians (54%, +8) disagree with the notion that a Conservative federal government would be better positioned at this point to deal with the tariffs implemented by the United States.

Just under half of Canadians (54%, -6) approve of the way their premier has managed the tariffs dispute, while 31% (-7) express a similar opinion of their provincial official opposition leader.

Among the four most populous provinces, Albertans provide the lowest approval rating for their premier on the issue of tariffs (36%, -11). The proportions are higher in Quebec (42%, -7), Ontario (45%, -13) and British Columbia (59%, +3).

The lowest rated provincial opposition leader on tariffs resides in British Columbia (24%, -10). The rating is superior among residents of Quebec (29%, -10), Ontario (33%, -6) and Alberta (45%, +8).

More than seven-in-ten Canadians continue to endorse the notion of Canada enhancing trade with the United Kingdom (77%, -1), Japan (also 77%, +2), the European Union (EU) (also 77%, =), Australia and New Zealand (also 77%, -2) and Mexico (73%, -3).

More than half of Canadians (56%, -1) think Canada should seriously consider requesting an independent dispute settlement panel under the terms of the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).

The idea of initiating a formal process for Canada to become an American state is backed by one-in-five Canadians (20%, =).

Only 8% of Canadians aged 55 and over are in favour of seriously considering Canada becoming an American state. The proportion is higher among those aged 35-to-54 (22%) and those aged 55 and over (30%).

Just under half of Canadians (48%, +2) support initiating a formal process for Canada to join the European Union (EU).

More than half of Canadians aged 18-to-34 (52%) would welcome Canada seriously considering an application to become an EU member, along with 45% of those aged 35-to-54 and 41% of those aged 55 and over.

Majorities of Canadians agree with four measures that have been tested since early 2025: Canada’s prime minister and provincial premiers suspending all steel, aluminum, and wood exports to the United States until U.S. President Donald Trump completely removes the threat of tariffs (62%, -3), Canada’s prime minister and provincial premiers shutting off all energy exports to the United States (59%, -4), Canada officially demanding an apology from Trump for his statements related to Canada becoming an American state (57%, -3) and Canada’s Minister of Foreign Affairs recalling the Canadian ambassador to the United States in response to Trump’s statements (51%, =).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Double-Digit Advantage for Governing Liberals in Canada

February 9, 2026February 7, 2026By Mario Canseco

Mark Carney holds a significant lead over Pierre Poilievre when voters ponder who would make the best prime minister.

Vancouver, BC [February 9, 2026] – The governing Liberal Party remains ahead of all other contenders in Canada’s federal political scene, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 45% of decided voters would cast a ballot for the Liberal candidate in their constituency, up two points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2025.

The Conservative Party is second with 32% (-6), followed by the New Democratic Party (NDP) with 10% (+2), the Bloc Québécois with 7% (+1), the Green Party with 3% (+1), the People’s Party with 2% (+1) and other parties and independent candidates with 1% (=).

The Liberals hold sizeable leads over the Conservatives in Atlantic Canada (54% to 37%), British Columbia (46% to 33%) and Ontario (46% to 38%).

In Quebec, the Liberals are first with 43%, followed by the Bloc with 29% and the Conservatives with 17%. The Conservatives hold a ten-point advantage over the Liberals in Alberta (44% to 34%).

This month, the Liberals are clearly ahead of the Conservatives among both male decided voters (44% to 34%) and female decided voters (46% to 31%). The governing party holds double-digit leads among Silent Generation / Baby Boomers (51% to 31%) and Millennials (43% to 30%). The race is closer, but still with the Liberals in first place, among Generation Z (38% to 33%) and Generation X (41% to 37%).

Just over one-in-five Canadians (21%, -3) say the economy and jobs is the most important issue facing the country right now, followed by housing, homelessness and poverty 18%, -4), Canada-U.S. Relations (16%, -1), health care (16%, +5) and immigration (11%, +1).

Prime Minister and Liberal leader Mark Carney holds the highest approval rating among all federal leaders at 55% (-1). The numbers are lower for Conservative and Official Opposition leader Pierre Poilievre (39%, -8), Green leader Elizabeth May (32%, -1), interim NDP leader Don Davies (28%, =), Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet (23%, -3) and People’s Party leader Maxime Bernier (20%, -2).

On the “Preferred Prime Minister” question, Carney is 19 points ahead of Poilievre (44% to 25%).

“More than half of Canada’s Baby Boomers (52%) prefer to have Mark Carney as prime minister,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The Liberal leader is also substantially ahead on this question in Atlantic Canada (49%), British Columbia (46%) and Quebec (also 46%).”

When Canadians are asked which of the two main party leaders would be the best to handle 11 different issues, Carney and Poilievre are tied on only one: crime and public safety (35% to 35%).

Carney is ahead of Poilievre on being the best person to handle foreign affairs (48% to 26%), accountability and leadership (46% to 26%), Canada-U.S. Relations (46% to 27%), the economy and jobs (45% to 30%), national unity (45% to 26%), energy and pipelines (43% to 29%), health care (42% to 27%), immigration (40% to 31%), the environment (40% to 23%) and housing, homelessness and poverty (39% to 27%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from February 4 to February 6, 2026, among a representative sample of 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians Assess Appropriateness of Flags at Legislatures

February 5, 2026January 31, 2026By Mario Canseco

Animosity is high for foreign banners, but residents support flying flags used by Indigenous peoples and sports teams.

Vancouver, BC [February 5, 2026] – Half of Canadians disagree with municipalities and state legislatures raising the flags of foreign countries, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 50% of Canadians think it is inappropriate for municipalities and provincial legislatures to raise flags of foreign countries—except the United Kingdom—while 27% consider the practice appropriate.

More than two-in-five Canadians (43%) believe it is appropriate for municipalities and provincial legislatures to fly the flag of the United Kingdom, while 36% deem this gesture inappropriate.

Canadians who voted for the Liberal Party in the 2025 federal election are more likely to endorse flying the Union Jack (56%) than those who cast ballots for the Conservative Party (45%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (39%).

Majorities of Canadians think it is appropriate for municipalities and provincial legislatures to raise flags used by Indigenous peoples in Canada (or that reference Indigenous causes) (61%) and flags that represent a local sports team (58%).

Just over than two thirds of Generation Z (67%) see no problem with flying Indigenous-themed flags, along with majorities of Millennials (62%), Generation X (59%) and Baby Boomers (58%).

The situation is similar for sports teams, with Baby Boomers slightly more likely to endorse raising these flags (61%) than Millennials (58%), Generation X (57%) and Generation Z (54%).

Canadians are divided when asked about municipalities and provincial legislatures raising flags that represent social causes (such as the rainbow flag or pride flag). While 43% consider this appropriate, 39% believe the gesture is inappropriate.

Almost half of Millennials (49%) think it is appropriate to fly flags that represent social causes. The proportions are lower among Baby Boomers (43%), Generation Z (also 43%) and Generation X (42%).

“Only 33% of Conservative voters in Canada endorse municipalities and provincial legislatures raising flags that represent social causes,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportion rises to 54% among New Democratic voters and to 62% among Liberal voters.”

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from January 11 to January 13, 2026, among a representative sample of 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Vancouverites Split on ABC, Like Progressive Voices in Council

February 2, 2026January 31, 2026By Mario Canseco

Practically three-in-five residents think the city needs a Mayor and Council similar to New York’s Zohran Mamdani.

Vancouver, BC [February 2, 2026] – After more than three years of a municipal government headed by Ken Sim and the A Better City (ABC) party, Vancouverites offer mixed reviews on what they have experienced so far, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative municipal sample, 27% of Vancouverites think Sim and ABC may not have gotten everything right, but would keep their leadership to make Vancouver better.

A slightly larger proportion of residents (32%) say Sim and ABC have not kept their key promises and call for a change in leadership at City Hall, but not a major change in policy.

More than one-in-four Vancouverites (27%) think Sim and ABC have shown that their policies do not work for Vancouver and want different ideas to make Vancouver better.

Only 15% of voters who supported Sim in the 2022 mayoral election believe ABC’s policies have not worked for Vancouver and call for a change—along with 44% of those who voted for Kennedy Stewart and 38% of those who voted for the minor candidates who received less than 10% of the vote in 2022.

Vancouver voters elected Sean Orr of the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE) and Lucy Maloney of OneCity Vancouver as city councillors in a by-election that took place in April 2025.

More than two-in-five Vancouverites (44%) think we “definitely” or “probably” need more Vancouver City Council members with the kind of progressive and left-wing views that Orr and Maloney represent, while 25% disagree and 30% are not sure.

Last year, voters in New York City elected Zohran Mamdani as Mayor. Mamdani has called for major changes to benefit working class New Yorkers.

Almost three-in-five Vancouverites (59%) believe their city needs a Mayor and Council like Mamdani, willing to make major changes that will make life more affordable, even if they make Vancouver’s elite uncomfortable.

Conversely, about one-in-four Vancouverites (23%) think a socialist mayor like Mamdami is too risky for Vancouver, will undermine investment in the city, and see a return to the soft-on-crime approaches of previous councils.

“Two thirds of Vancouverites aged 18-to-34 (67%) think the city would benefit from a mayor and council like the one currently in place in New York,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities of residents aged 35-to-45 (53%) and aged 55 and over (60%) share this view.”

Across Vancouver, 47% of residents agree with the city eliminating the Board of Parks and Recreation, and placing public parks and the public recreation system under the jurisdiction of City Council, down five points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2022.

Seven-in-ten Vancouverites (70%) think the residents of the City of Vancouver should decide in a referendum if the Board of Parks and Recreation should be eliminated.

Vancouverites were also asked to place eight municipal political parties and associations in the political spectrum.

At least two-in-five Vancouverites see four parties as centre right, centre or centre left: ABC (48%), OneCity Vancouver (44%), the Vancouver Liberals (40%) and TEAM for a Livable Vancouver (also 40%). Fewer residents feel the same way about the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE) (39%), Vote Vancouver (also 39%), the Green Party (38%) and the Conservative Electors Association (30%).

Just over a third of Vancouverites (34%) brand the Conservative Electors Association as right or extreme right, followed by ABC with 17%, TEAM with 13% and the Vancouver Liberals also with 13%.

Three-in-ten residents (30%) believe the Greens are left or extreme left, followed by COPE and OneCity with 20% each and the Vancouver Liberals with 15%.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from January 26 to January 28, 2026, among a representative sample of 401 adults in the City of Vancouver. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 4.9 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Positive Opinions on Immigration Tumble Across Canada

January 29, 2026January 31, 2026By Mario Canseco

Majorities of Albertans and Ontarians think immigration is having mostly negative effect in the country.

Vancouver, BC [January 29, 2026] – Only a third of Canadians currently hold favourable views on immigration, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 34% of Canadians think immigration is having a mostly positive effect in Canada, down nine points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in July 2025.

Almost half of Canadians (48%, +9) say immigration is having a mostly negative effect in the country.

“In February 2022, only 26% of Canadians described immigration in a negative light,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportion has jumped to 48% in the first month of 2026.”

More than half of Canadians who reside in Ontario (53%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (52%) and Alberta (51%) think immigration is having a mostly negative effect in Canada. The numbers are lower in British Columbia (43%), Atlantic Canada (also 43%) and Quebec (39%).

Positive perceptions on immigration reach 37% among Baby Boomers in Canada. Fewer members of Generation Z (35%), Millennials (also 35%) and Generation X (29%) share this view.

As was the case last year, more than two-in-five Canadians (42%, +1) believe it is time for the number of legal immigrants who are allowed to relocate in Canada to decrease, while more than a third (35%, +1) would keep the current levels and 13% (-3) support an increase.

A drop in legal immigration is backed by 28% (-2) of Canadians aged 18-to-34, but rises to 44% (+4) among those aged 35-to-54, and to 53% (+2) among those aged 55 and over.

Canadians remain torn when asked to choose between two distinct concepts to manage immigration.

More than two-in-five Canadians (43%, -1) prefer the melting pot, where immigrants assimilate and blend into Canadian society. A slightly smaller proportion (41%, +1) select the mosaic, where cultural differences within Canadian society are considered valuable and worth preserving.

Millennials across Canada prefer the mosaic over the melting pot (44% to 39%), while Generation X is practically tied when assessing the two concepts (Melting Pot 44%, Mosaic 43%). Both Baby Boomers and Generation Z pick the melting pot over the mosaic (49% to 39% and 42% to 35%, respectively).

More than three-in-five Canadians (63%, -5) say the hard work and talent of immigrants makes Canada better.

More than seven-in-ten Canadians who voted for the Liberal Party (79%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (72%) in last year’s federal election agree with the statement, compared to only 55% among those who cast ballots for Conservative Party candidates.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Support for Lower Speed Limits Increases in British Columbia

January 22, 2026January 22, 2026By Mario Canseco

Just over two thirds of respondents would welcome a reduction on all residential streets in their municipality.

Vancouver, BC [January 22, 2026] – British Columbians are open to a major change in the way vehicles are allowed to circulate on specific areas of their municipality, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 68% of British Columbians would personally like to see the speed limit reduced to 30 km/h on all residential streets, while keeping the speed limit on arterial and collector roads at 50 km/h, up five points since a similar Research Co. survey conducted in November 2024.

Residents of the Fraser Valley (71%, +9) are definitely in favour of reducing the speed limit to 30 km/h on all residential streets. Support for the policy is also high in Northern BC (70%, +9), Metro Vancouver (69%, +4), Vancouver Island (64%, +5) and Southern BC (58%, =).

In 2019, Vancouver City Council unanimously passed a motion to establish a pilot project to reduce the speed limit to 30 km/h on select residential streets in the city. In June 2025, Vancouver City Council unanimously approved reducing speed limits on local streets to 30 km/h.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (71%, +4) believe Vancouver’s course of action on residential speed limits is a “very good” or “good” idea.

“Three-in-five British Columbians aged 35-to-54 (60%) think it is a good idea to reduce speed limits on local streets,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Agreement is higher among those aged 55 and over (66%) and those aged 18-to-34 (77%).”

Compared to 2023, there is little change in the perceptions of British Columbians on speeding drivers. Two-in-five (40%, =) report seeing a car circulating above the speed limit of 50 km/h on the street where they live “at least once a day”, while about a third (32%, +2) say this happens “a few times a week”.

British Columbians are also supportive of automated speed enforcement, which works by using cameras or sensors to pick up a vehicle speeding. A ticket is then issued to the owner of the vehicle. Driver’s license points are not issued as the driver of the vehicle cannot be identified.

Speed-on-green intersection cameras, or red light cameras that also capture vehicles that are speeding through intersections, are currently being used in 140 intersections across the province. More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (73%, +1) approve of this type of automated speed enforcement.

Majorities of British Columbians also approve of the use of three other types of automated speed enforcement: fixed speed cameras, which stay in one location and measure speed as a vehicle passes (76%, +5), mobile speed cameras, which can be moved from place to place (68%, +4), and point-to-point enforcement, which uses cameras at two or more distant points on a road to issue tickets to vehicles whose average speed over the distance was excessive (63%, -8).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from January 11 to January 13, 2026, among 800 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Few Americans Share Trump’s Expansionist Aspirations

January 19, 2026January 16, 2026By Mario Canseco

Only one-in-fourteen Americans think Canada, Greenland or Panama should become American states.

Vancouver, BC [January 19, 2026] – Majorities of Americans would prefer for four nations to remain independent and do not entertain any major changes to their sovereignty, a new Research Co. poll has found.

The online survey of a representative national sample asked Americans their preference when thinking about four countries and two territories.

Two thirds of Americans (66%) want Canada to remain an independent nation, while 10% would prefer for it to become a U.S. territory and 7% would declare it an American state.

The results are very similar when Americans ponder Mexico, with just over two thirds (67%) maintaining the status quo of Mexico as an independent nation and fewer opting for the country to become a U.S. territory (10%) or an American state (5%).

Just over half of African Americans (53%) think Mexico should remain an independent country. The proportions are higher among respondents who are White (71%) or Hispanic/Latino (74%).

More than half of Americans (57%) would like to see Cuba remain as an independent nation, while 18% want the island to become a U.S. territory and 4% would prefer to see it as an American state.

When Americans ponder the future of Panama, more than half (54%) think the Central American nation should be independent, while fewer consider making it a U.S. territory (17%) or an American state (7%).

More than half of Americans (56%) believe Greenland—an autonomous territory of Denmark—should retain this status in the future. Fewer than one-in-five (16%) wish to make Greenland a U.S. territory, while just one-in-fourteen (7%) would welcome it as an American state.

“More than one-in-four Americans who voted for Donald Trump in 2024 (27%) are in favour of turning Greenland into a U.S. territory,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Only one-in-ten Americans who cast a ballot for Kamala Harris (10%) share this view.”

Perceptions are more nuanced when Americans are asked about Puerto Rico. More than two-in-five respondents (43%) would prefer for the Caribbean island to maintain its current status as a U.S. territory, while 24% would like to see it as an independent nation and 17% would choose to make it an American state.

Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from January 13 to January 15, 2026, among 1,002 adults in the United States. The data has been statistically weighted according to U.S. census figures for age, gender and region. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians OK with Legalizing Marijuana, But Not Other Drugs

January 12, 2026January 7, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than three-in-five Canadians think companies should be able to administer “drug tests” to any employee.

Vancouver, BC [January 12, 2026] – Most Canadians maintain favourable views on the federal government’s decision to legalize marijuana but would not extend the same classification to other drugs that are currently banned, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, almost two thirds of Canadians (65%, +3 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in October 2024) agree with marijuana being legal in the country, while 29% (-4) disagree and 6% (+2) are undecided.

More than seven-in-ten Atlantic Canadians (72%, +16) have no problem with marijuana being legal in Canada. Majorities of respondents in Alberta (65%, +1), Ontario (also 65%, +1), British Columbia (also 65%, +5), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (63%, +10) and Quebec (60%, -6) share the same view.

More than half of Canadians whose heritage is South Asian (54%) or East Asian (56%) agree with marijuana being legal in Canada. The proportion rises to 68% among Canadians of European origins and to 75% among those with Indigenous descent.

More than a third of Canadians (36%) admit to consuming marijuana in Canada before it was legal, while 15% only tried it after cannabis was legalized in October 2018. About half of Canadians (49%) say they have not consumed marijuana in Canada.

Fewer than half of Canadians who have used marijuana after legalization (48%, -3) say all of their cannabis was acquired at a licensed retailer, while a slightly smaller proportion (46%, +6) acknowledge that “most”, “some” or “none” of their marijuana was purchased this way.

The highest proportion of marijuana consumers who purchased all of their cannabis at a licensed retailer is observed in Atlantic Canada (60%), followed by Alberta (58%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (52%) and Ontario (49%). The proportions are decidedly lower in British Columbia (42%) and Quebec (41%).

Few Canadians believe other drugs should be made readily available for consumers across the country. About one-in-seven (14%, -1) would consent to legalizing ecstasy and fewer would follow the same course of action to commercialize powder cocaine (12%, -2), crack cocaine (10%, -2), methamphetamine or “crystal meth” (also 10%, -2), heroin (9%, -3) or fentanyl (9%, -1).

In some countries, including the United States, a company can administer “drug tests” to employees, even if they do not operate machinery (such as pilots, truck drivers or crane operators). As was the case last year, more than three-in-five Canadians (64%, +1) believe companies in Canada should be able to administer “drug tests” to any employee now that marijuana is legal.

“There is no political divide when Canadians are asked about drug tests for employees,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities of respondents who voted for the Conservatives (69%), the Liberals (68%) or the New Democrats (58%) in 2025 think the measure is justified now that marijuana is legal.”

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from December 7 to December 9, 2025, among a representative sample of 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Three-in-Ten Albertans Open to Independence from Canada

January 8, 2026January 7, 2026By Mario Canseco

Support for sovereignty is strongest among the province’s residents aged 18-to-34.

Vancouver, BC [January 8, 2026] – The proportion of Albertans who are in favour of sovereignty has increased over the past year and a half, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 31% of Albertans support Alberta becoming a country independent from Canada, up nine points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2023.

Just over three-in-five Albertans (62%, -9) are opposed to independence, while 7% (=) are undecided.

“By a 2-to-1 margin, Albertans currently express a desire to remain in Canada,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Still, the growth of separatist sentiment is significant across some groups.”

More than two-in-five Albertans aged 18-to-34 (42%, +15) support Alberta becoming a country independent from Canada. The proportions are lower among those aged 35-to-54 (27%, +2) and those aged 55 and over (25%, +9).

Separatist feelings rose across all three major regions of the province. More than three-in-ten residents of the Calgary Metropolitan Area (31%, +5) voice support for an independent Alberta, along with 29% of residents of the Edmonton Metropolitan Area (+5) and 34% of those who live elsewhere in the province (+11).

Albertans who voted for the United Conservative Party (UCP) in the 2023 provincial election are significantly more likely to back independence (40%, +11) than those who cast ballots for the New Democratic Party (NDP) (11%, +2).

In a separate question, just under one-in-four Albertans (24%, +5) support their province joining the United States, while more than seven-in-ten (72%, -2) disagree and 5% (-2) are not sure.

The notion of Alberta becoming an American state is more popular among Albertans aged 18-to-34 (32%), those who do not reside in Calgary or Edmonton (27%) and UCP voters in the 2023 provincial election (29%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from January 4 to January 6, 2026, among 703 adults in Alberta. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.7 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Similar Views on Animals in Canada and the United States

December 4, 2025December 5, 2025By Mario Canseco

Vancouver, BC [December 4, 2025] – Few residents of Canada and the United States voice support for two practices related to animals, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of representative national samples, only 19% of Americans (-6 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2020) and 16% of Canadians (-1 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in July 2024) are in favour of killing animals for their fur.

“There is a significant gender gap when it comes to killing animals for their fur in the Canada and the United States,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “While 25% of American men and 22% of Canadian men see no problem with this practice, only 12% of women in each of the two countries feel the same way.”

On a regional basis, acceptance of killing animals for their fur in Canada is highest in Atlantic Canada (22%) and Saskatchewan and Manitoba (also 22%), followed by British Columbia (17%), Ontario (16%), Quebec (15%) and Alberta (13%).

In the United States, the results on this question are steady across all four census regions: South (20%), West (19%), Northeast (18%) and Midwest (17%).

In Canada, similar proportions of respondents of four different ethnicities are in favour of killing animals for their fur: Indigenous (17%), East Asian (16%), European (also 16%) and South Asian (14%).

Just under one-in-four African Americans (24%) are in favour of killing animals for their fur. The proportions are lower among respondents in the United States who are white (18%) or Hispanic (14%).

There are two issues where there is a sizeable difference between the two countries.

The use of animals in rodeos is endorsed by 41% of Americans (-5) and 25% of Canadians (-1).

More than half of Americans who identify as Republicans (56%) are in favour of using animals in rodeos, compared to 39% among Independents and 32% among Democrats.

In Canada, just over a third of people who voted for the Conservative Party in this year’s federal election (34%) see no problem with using animals in rodeos. The proportions are lower among those who cast ballots for the Liberal Party (22%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (15%).

While more than half of Americans (52%, -12) favour keeping animals in zoos and aquariums, only 34% of Canadians (-2) concur.

Once again, political allegiance plays a role in public perceptions. More than three-in-five Republicans (63%) are in favour of keeping animals in zoos and aquariums, compared to just under half of Democrats (48%) and Independents (47%).

In Canada, support for keeping animals in zoos and aquariums is highest among Conservative voters (38%), followed by Liberals (33%) and New Democrats (25%).

Just over one-in-five Americans (21%, -4) are in favour of hunting animals for sport, compared to only 12% (+1) of Canadians.

Republicans in the United States are more likely to voice support for hunting animals for sport (30%) than Independents (19%) or Democrats (16%). The political fluctuations are not as deep in Canada, with similar proportions of residents who voted for the Conservatives (14%), the Liberals (11%) and the New Democrats this year (also 11%) being in favour of trophy hunting.

The views of residents are significantly different on hunting animals for meat, with three-in-five Canadians (60%, =) and two thirds of Americans (66%, -1) favouring this practice.

American men (75%) and Canadian men (67%) are more supportive of hunting animals for meat than American women (56%) and Canadian women (55%).

Almost seven-in-ten respondents in the two countries (69% each) are in favour of eating animals. In each country, the proportion of supporters is highest among residents aged 55 and over (72% in Canada and 73% in the United States).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 21 to November 23, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada and 1,001 adults in the United States. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in each country. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, for each country.

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Metro Vancouver Governments Score High on Some Key Services

December 1, 2025December 2, 2025By Mario Canseco

Satisfaction is lowest on public safety, resident engagement and dealing with homelessness and poverty.

Vancouver, BC [December 1, 2025] – Most residents of Metro Vancouver think their municipal administrations are managing eight issues properly, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative regional sample, at least three-in-five Metro Vancouverites say their municipal government has done a “very good” or “good” job managing parks and recreation facilities (68%), providing good sanitation services (66%) and fostering artistic and cultural activities (60%).

Five other issues get a positive review from more than half of Metro Vancouverites: protecting the environment (58%), promoting tourism (56%), dealing with transportation (55%), managing development and growth (53%) and enhancing the quality of life of residents (51%).

The satisfaction rating is lower for five other competencies: making City Hall work in a transparent and unbiased fashion (47%), handling finances (46%), dealing with crime and public safety (45%), engaging with residents (also 45%) and dealing with homelessness and poverty (32%).

More than half of Metro Vancouverites (57%) approve of the performance of the mayor of their municipality, while a third (33%) disapprove and 11% are undecided.

“Across Metro Vancouver, approval for mayors is high among men (62%) and residents aged 18-to-34 (64%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are lower among women (55%) and residents aged 55 and over (51%).”

On a regional basis, the approval rating for mayors is highest in Burnaby, New Westminster and the Tri-Cities (69%), followed by Vancouver (58%), Surrey and White Rock (also 58%), four municipalities in the Fraser Valley (57%), five municipalities in the North Shore (48%) and Richmond and Delta (46%).

Municipal elections in British Columbia use the “at-large system” for elections to council. This means that councillors are elected to represent the entire municipality and not a specific portion of it.

Just over three-in-five Metro Vancouverites (61%) are satisfied with the “at-large system” for elections to council. Residents of Burnaby, New Westminster and the Tri-Cities, Surrey and White Rock, and the four Fraser Valley municipalities are more likely to be satisfied with the “at-large system” (all at 62%) than those in Vancouver (59%), the North Shore (57%) and Richmond and Delta (48%).

Respondents were also asked about changing existing guidelines to adopt different systems for council elections.

More than half of respondents (55%) support relying on the “single transferable vote system”, in which votes are initially allocated to a voter’s most preferred candidate, and as the count proceeds and candidates are either elected or eliminated, it is transferred to other candidates in accordance with the voter’s stated preferences.

Opposition to the “single transferable vote system” is highest among Metro Vancouverites aged 55 and over (34%) and North Shore residents (41%).

Just over three-in-five Metro Vancouverites (61%) support adopting the “ward system”, in which councillors are elected to represent a specific portion or neighbourhood in a municipality.

A move to the “ward system” is particularly popular in Surrey and White Rock (66%) and Vancouver (64%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 14 to November 16, 2025, among 1,501 adults in Metro Vancouver. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in Metro Vancouver. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 2.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Metro Vancouverites Evenly Split on “Mega-Amalgamation”

November 27, 2025November 28, 2025By Mario Canseco

Support is higher for smaller mergers involving fewer cities, particularly those located in the Fraser Valley.

Vancouver, BC [November 27, 2025] – The creation of a “mega-city” encompassing all of Metro Vancouver’s existing municipalities is a contentious proposal, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative regional sample, 42% of Metro Vancouverites think the amalgamation of all municipalities into one is a “very good” or “good” idea, while the same proportion (42%) consider it “bad” or “very bad”.

“Residents of the City of Vancouver boast the highest level of support for the creation of an amalgamated Metro Vancouver (46%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The appetite for full amalgamation drops across all other regions.”

More than two-in-five residents of Surrey and White Rock (44%), the North Shore (43%) and four Fraser Valley municipalities (41%) regard the “mega-city” idea positively. The results are lower in Richmond and Delta (39%) and in Burnaby, New Westminster and the Tri-Cities (32%).

Metro Vancouverites aged 18-to-34 and aged 35-to-54 are more supportive of the creation of a “mega-city” (47% each) than their counterparts aged 55 and over (34%).

The survey also asked Metro Vancouverites about six smaller amalgamation proposals.

Seven-in-ten Metro Vancouverites (70%) think it is a “very good” or “good” idea for the Township of Langley and the City of Langley to merge into one municipality, while 62% feel the same way about a city encompassing Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge.

Residents of these four Fraser Valley municipalities are particularly welcoming of these two amalgamation proposals, with 68% being in favour of uniting the Township of Langley and the City of Langley and 67% supporting a merger involving Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge.

More than half of Metro Vancouverites (54%) view a possible merger of the City of Surrey and the City of White Rock in a positive light—including 57% of respondents who reside in these two cities.

Just under three-in-five Metro Vancouverites (57%) think it would be a “very good” or “good” idea to combine the City of North Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver, the District of West Vancouver, the Village of Lions Bay and Bowen Island Municipality into a single municipality.

Among residents of these five entities, support for a purported “North Shore” city stands at 47%, with a slightly higher proportion (51%) voicing opposition to the concept.

More than half of Metro Vancouverites (56%) think it would be a “very good” or “good” idea to merge the Village of Anmore. the Village of Belcarra, the City of Coquitlam, the City of Port Coquitlam and the City of Port Moody into one municipality, while fewer than half (47%) would entertain uniting the City of Burnaby and the City of New Westminster.

Residents of these municipalities are not keen on amalgamation, with 44% saying they favour uniting the Tri-Cities and the two villages and 36% supporting a union between Burnaby and New Westminster.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

High Concern in British Columbia After Cowichan Tribes Ruling

November 24, 2025November 25, 2025By Mario Canseco

Territory acknowledgements are supported by most of the province’s residents; fewer think the word “settler” is adequate.

Vancouver, BC [November 24, 2025] – While a sizeable majority of British Columbians are anxious about a recent court decision, most also express positive views about the right of self-determination for Indigenous peoples and find territory acknowledgements adequate, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 44% of British Columbians say they are following news related to the recent B.C. Supreme Court decision “very closely” or “moderately closely”.

The B.C. Supreme Court ruled that the Cowichan Tribes had “established Aboriginal title” to more than 5.7 square kilometres of land in Richmond and stated that Aboriginal title is a “prior and senior right” to other property interests, regardless of whether the land in question is public or private.

More than two thirds of British Columbians (68%) think property owners in British Columbia should be concerned about the consequences of the court’s decision, including 79% of those aged 55 and over and 75% who own their primary residence.

More than half of British Columbians (52%) believe all negotiations related to Aboriginal title agreements in British Columbia should be paused until the Cowichan Tribes case is settled.

Fewer than half of British Columbians agree with two other statements: that fee simple title in private property should always be superior to Aboriginal title (47%) and that the B.C. Supreme Court’s recent decision erases private property ownership (45%).

Just under half of British Columbians (48%)—and 45% of property owners—say they believe the Cowichan Tribes when they say they are not looking to displace any individual from the properties they own.

Most British Columbians (54%) think the City of Richmond took the correct course of action by sending an official letter to property owners in the claimed area, warning them that the decision “may compromise the status and validity” of their ownership. Fewer than three-in-ten British Columbians (27%) think the City of Richmond overreacted to the situation.

Across the province, more than a third of respondents (35%) had heard about the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)—a proportion that rises to 62% among those of Indigenous descent.

UNDRIP establishes global standards for the rights of Indigenous peoples. It outlines collective and individual rights, such as self-determination, and the right to maintain distinct cultures, languages and institutions.

The UNDRIP Act, which came into effect in June 2021, requires the Canadian government to ensure all laws are consistent with the Declaration, in consultation with Indigenous peoples, and mandates the creation of an action plan to achieve the Declaration’s objectives.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (73%) think the UNDRIP Act is a positive development for Canada, while 14% perceive it negatively and 13% are undecided.

More than two thirds of British Columbians (68%) say territory acknowledgements are adequate in today’s Canada, while 18% consider the practice inadequate.

“At least two thirds of residents of the Fraser Valley (69%), Metro Vancouver (69%) and Southern BC (66%) think territory acknowledgements are adequate,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities in Vancouver Island (61%) and Northern BC (59%) also share this view.”

The practice of non-Indigenous Canadians and Permanent Residents calling themselves “settlers” is seen as adequate by 45% of British Columbians and as inadequate by 30%.

The public is divided on whether people should speak positively about the Residential School system, with 39% believing this is adequate and 43% claiming it is inadequate.

More than three-in-five British Columbians (63%) think the right of self-determination—meaning that Indigenous people can determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and dispose of and benefit from their wealth and natural resources—has been positive for Canada.

Similar proportions of British Columbians think First Nations and Indigenous organizations across British Columbia should decide what type of housing projects can be built on their territories (66%) and if natural resource projects can be established on their territories (62%).

More than two-in-five British Columbians think that, compared to 20 years ago, First Nations and Indigenous organizations are doing better on cultural development (50%), economic development (49%) and social development (44%).

Economic Reconciliation is defined as “the process of making economic amends for historical injustices to Indigenous Peoples.” British Columbians are divided in their assessment of the current situation, with 23% saying the federal government is doing “too much” on Economic Reconciliation, while 27% believe it “needs to do more”.

Equal proportions of British Columbians think the provincial government is doing “too much” (24%) or “needs to do more” (also 24%) on Economic Reconciliation. Only 18% of respondents think municipal administrations are doing “too much” on this file.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 18 to November 20, 2025, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Assess Options for BC Conservatives

November 13, 2025November 12, 2025By Mario Canseco

Dianne Watts, Christy Clark, Gavin Dew, Elenore Sturko and Aaron Gunn do best in test of 15 possible leadership contenders.

Vancouver, BC [November 13, 2025] – Five politicians would allow the Conservative Party of BC to provide a serious challenge to the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) in a British Columbia provincial election, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In early October, the BC NDP held a six-point advantage over the BC Conservatives among decided voters in British Columbia

The early November online survey of a representative provincial sample asked British Columbians how they would vote in an election with 15 different options leading the Conservative Party of BC.

With former Surrey Mayor and MP Dianne Watts as leader, the BC Conservatives would be tied with the BC NDP at 21% among all voters.

The official opposition would trail the governing party by just one point under the leadership of former premier Christy Clark (26% to 25%) or current Kelowna-Mission MLA Gavin Dew (20% to 19%).

The BC Conservatives would be two points behind the BC New Democrats under two other leaders: Surrey-Cloverdale MLA Elenore Sturko (23% to 21%) and North Island—Powell River MP Aaron Gunn (20% to 18%).

The BC NDP would have four-point leads over the BC Conservatives under the leadership of Port Coquitlam Mayor Brad West (25% to 21%) or former Transportation Minister Todd Stone (20% to 16%).

The BC Conservatives would trail the BC New Democrats by five points under former BC Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson (23% to 18%), current MP Ellis Ross (21% to 16%) and former BC United West Vancouver-Capilano candidate Caroline Elliott (23% to 18%).

The lead for the BC NDP is larger if the BC Conservatives are commanded by Kamloops Centre MLA Peter Milobar (24% to 18%), 2024 West Vancouver-Sea to Sky candidate Yuri Fulmer (25% to 19%) and former MP and federal cabinet minister James Moore (24% to 16%).

The two worst performing prospective candidates tested are Bryan Breguet, who ran unsuccessfully for the BC Conservatives in Vancouver-Langara in 2024 (23% to 14%), and Langley-Abbotsford MLA Harman Bhangu (25% to 14%).

More than a third of British Columbians (36%, +3 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2024) place themselves at the centre of the political spectrum. Fewer residents of the province say they are centre right, right or extreme right (28%, -2) or centre left, left or extreme left (21%, -1).

When asked about the province’s political parties, more than half of British Columbians (53%, +1) say the BC NDP is centre left, left or extreme left, while almost two thirds (64%, +3) consider the BC Conservatives as centre right, right or extreme right.

The BC Green Party is regarded as centre left, left or extreme left by 45% of British Columbians (+2). CentreBC is placed in the middle of the spectrum by a third of the province’s residents (with 39% saying they are not sure), while OneBC is regarded as centre right, right or extreme right by 23% of British Columbians (with 49% saying they are not sure).

The five party leaders yielded results that mirrored the parties they represent. BC Premier and BC NDP leader David Eby is considered centre left, left or extreme left by just over half of British Columbians (51%, +3), while 62% (+4) say BC Conservative leader John Rustad is centre right, right or extreme right.

BC Green leader Emily Lowan is regarded as centre left, left or extreme left by 42% of British Columbians. One-in-four of the province’s residents (25%) say Centre BC leader Karin Kirkpatrick is a centrist, while 19% believe Dallas Brodie of OneBC is centre right, right or extreme right. Sizeable proportions of British Columbians do not know enough about Kirkpatrick (48%) or Brodie (51%) to place them on the spectrum.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 24 to October 26, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Spanberger Clearly Ahead in Virginia’s Gubernatorial Election

November 3, 2025November 3, 2025By Mario Canseco

In New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill is ahead of Republican Jack Ciattarelli.

Vancouver, BC [November 3, 2025] – The candidates for the Democratic Party head to tomorrow’s gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey in different circumstances, according to two new polls conducted by Research Co. in Virginia and New Jersey.

The surveys of voters who have already cast their ballot in the elections or plan to do so tomorrow show a significant advantage for the Democrats in the Old Dominion State, and a closer race in the Garden State.

Virginia

Republican Glenn Youngkin defeated Democrat Terry McAuliffe in the 2021 gubernatorial race in Virginia (51% to 49%). The Old Dominion State does not allow incumbent governors to serve consecutive terms.

More than half of decided voters in Virginia (54%) would back Democratic candidate Abigail Spanberger in this year’s gubernatorial election, while 46% would cast a ballot for Republican contender Winsome Earle-Sears.

Earle-Sears has her best showing among decided voters aged 18-to-34 (53% to 47%), while Spanberger is ahead among decided voters aged 35-to-54 (58% to 42%) and aged 55 and over (55% to 45%).

About one-in-six decided voters who supported the GOP’s Youngkin in 2021 (15%) are backing Spanberger in 2025.

New Jersey

In the 2021 New Jersey gubernatorial election, incumbent Democratic Party governor Phil Murphy defeated Republican Party candidate Jack Ciattarelli (51% to 48%). The Garden State has a two consecutive term limit for governors.

The 2025 gubernatorial race in New Jersey is very similar to the previous one, with Democratic candidate Mikie Sherrill holding a three-point edge over Republican Ciattarelli among decided voters (51% to 48%), with 1% going to Libertarian candidate Vic Kaplan.

Ciattarelli does particularly well with decided voters aged 55 and over (57% to 43%), while Sherrill holds the upper hand with decided voters aged 35-to-54 (52% to 46%) and aged 18-to-34 (58% to 41%).

More than half of decided voters who are Independent (54%) would support Sherrill tomorrow, while 43% would back Ciattarelli and 3% would support Kaplan.

Methodology: Results are based on online studies conducted on November 2 and November 3, 2025, among representative samples of 450 likely voters in two American states: New Jersey and Virginia. The data has been statistically weighted according to U.S. census figures for age and gender in each state. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 4.6 percentage points for each state.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians Remain Satisfied with Scope of MAID Legislation

October 30, 2025October 29, 2025By Mario Canseco

The proportion of residents who would completely ban medical assistance in dying jumped by six points since 2023.

Vancouver, BC [October 30, 2025] – The perceptions of Canadians on the existing guidelines that allow medical assistance in dying have not gone through severe fluctuations over the past two years, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 52% of Canadians are satisfied with the regulations, up four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in April 2023.

Equal proportions of Canadians are either dissatisfied with the rules related to medical assistance in dying (24%, -3) or are undecided (also 24%, -1).

“Fewer than half of Conservative Party voters in the 2025 federal election (46%) are content with Canada’s medical assistance in dying laws,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are higher among those who cast ballots for New Democratic Party (NDP) (53%) or Liberal Party (59%) candidates.”

Canadians of East Asian descent are the least likely to endorse the status quo on medical assistance in dying (47%). Satisfaction is higher among Canadians whose heritage is European (51%), South Asian (58%) or Indigenous (60%).

More than three-in-five Quebecers (62%) endorse the current guidelines that allow a person to seek medical assistance in dying. The proportions are lower in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (52%), Atlantic Canada (51%), British Columbia (also 51%), Ontario (49%), and Alberta (45%).

When asked about their personal feelings, almost three-in-five Canadians (58%, =) believe medical assistance in dying should be allowed, but only under specific circumstances.

Similar proportions of Canadians think medical assistance in dying should either never be allowed (18%, +6) or always be permitted (16%, -4).

Three-in-four Canadians (75%, +2) support an individual being permitted to seek medical assistance in dying in Canada if these conditions are met:

Being eligible for health services funded by the federal government, or a province or territory (or during the applicable minimum period of residence or waiting period for eligibility).
Being at least 18 years old and mentally competent.
Having a grievous and irremediable medical condition.
Making a voluntary request for medical assistance in dying that is not the result of outside pressure or influence.
Giving informed consent to receive medical assistance in dying.

Under the current legislation, only an adult with a grievous and irremediable medical condition can seek medical assistance in dying in Canada.

Fewer than half of Canadians are willing to expand the scope of existing legislation to allow medical assistance in dying in cases of inability to receive medical treatment (49%, -2), disability (46%, -4), mental illness (42%, -1), homelessness (26%, -2) or poverty (25%, -2).

Practically half of Canadians (49%, +7) believe anyone who helps a person to commit suicide should be prosecuted, while just over three-in-ten (31%, -3) disagree and one-in-five (20%, -3) are not sure.

Canadians aged 18-to-34 are more likely to think that aiding a person to commit suicide should remain a criminal offence (60%, +8) than their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (48%, +7) and aged 55 and over (41%, +7).

Canadians remain divided when asked about the appropriate punishment for a parent who is found guilty of assisting a terminally ill son or daughter to die.

Just under three-in-ten Canadians (28%, -1) express a preference for a prison sentence at the discretion of a judge, while15% (+7) think the crime calls for a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment.

Just over one-in-ten (11%, -3) think the actions in this case can be dealt with through a fine and no time in prison, while just under one-in-four Canadians (23%, -1) choose no penalty at all.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 15 to October 17, 2025, among 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Back Foreign Real Estate Purchase Ban

October 23, 2025October 22, 2025By Mario Canseco

More than three-in-five (62%) want municipal governments to dismantle encampments or “tent cities”.

Vancouver, BC [October 22, 2025] – Residents of British Columbia continue to overwhelmingly support the federal government’s decision to ban foreigners from purchasing real estate in Canada, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 74% of British Columbians agree with the decision to ban non-Canadians (with exclusions for international students and temporary residents) from purchasing residential properties in Canada until 2027, up four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in February 2024.

“The federal ban on foreign ownership of real estate is not a contentious issue in British Columbia,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The policy is endorsed by sizeable majorities of the province’s residents whose heritage is Indigenous (82%), South Asian (78%), European (76%) or East Asian (67%).”

More than half of British Columbians (57%, +8) think the provincial government was right to implement a $400 renters’ credit for households earning up to $63,000 a year. Support for this policy reaches 63% among British Columbians who rent.

More than a third of British Columbians (37%, +8) call on the like the provincial government to cancel the home owner grant, which reduces the amount of property tax people pay for their principal residence.

More than three-in-five British Columbians continue to voice support for two ideas: the federal government tying immigration numbers to affordable housing targets and new housing starts (66%, +1) and municipal governments immediately dismantling any encampment or “tent city” located within their municipality (62%, =).

This month, support for dismantling “tent cities” is highest in Metro Vancouver (66%, +7), followed by the Fraser Valley (62%, -4), Vancouver Island (56%, -6), Northern BC (53%, -4) and Southern BC (50%, -1).

For the first time since June 2020, more than half of British Columbians (54%, +13) expect the actions of the provincial government to be effective in making housing more affordable in British Columbia.

Majorities of British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (59%) and aged 35-to-54 (56%) are optimistic about the actions of the provincial government, along with 46% of their counterparts aged 55 and over.

The housing policies implemented during the tenure of John Horgan as Premier of British Columbia remain popular in 2025. At least two thirds of the province’s residents endorse increasing the foreign buyers tax from 15% to 20% (74%, =), expanding the foreign buyers tax to areas located outside of Metro Vancouver (73%, +2), introducing a “speculation tax” in specific urban areas targeting foreign and domestic homeowners who pay little or no income tax in BC, and those who own second properties that aren’t long-term rentals (70%, +1), increasing the property transfer tax from 3% to 5% for homes valued at more than $3 million (66%, +4) and introducing a tax of 0.2% on the value of homes between $3 million and $4 million, and a tax rate of 0.4% on the portion of a home’s value that exceeds $4 million (also 66%, +4).

A set of policies brought forward after David Eby took over as Premier are also backed by majorities of British Columbians, including building more modular supportive homes in areas where people are experiencing homelessness (73%, -2), capping rent increases in 2025 at 3% (70%, +4), implementing a three-business-day protection period for financing and home inspections (66%, -3), raising the fines for short-term rental hosts who break local municipal by-laws to $3,000 per day per infraction (65%, -4), removing strata rental restrictions (58%, +6), ending most strata age restrictions (also 58%, -2) and banning homeowners from operating a short-term rental business unless it is located on their principal residence and/or on a different unit on their property (56%, -2).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 13 to October 15, 2025, among 802 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Upward Trend for Mandatory Vaccinations for Children in Canada

October 9, 2025October 9, 2025By Mario Canseco

A third of Albertans (34%) believe all decisions on inoculation belong to parents.

Vancouver, BC [October 9, 2025] – There has been a sizeable increase in the level of support for mandatory vaccinations for childhood diseases—such as polio or measles—in Canada, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 72% of Canadians think vaccinations for children should “definitely” or “probably” be mandatory in their province, up five points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in October 2024.

Just under one-in-four Canadians (23%, -6) believe parents should “definitely” or “probably” be the ones deciding whether their children should be vaccinated.

A third of respondents in Alberta (34%, =) reject any mandate related to childhood vaccinations. The proportions are lower in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (22%, -8), Ontario (also 22%, -6), Quebec (21%, -10), British Columbia (also 21%, -9) and Atlantic Canada (19%, -9).

“While support for mandatory childhood vaccinations increased to 72% in 2025, it is still nowhere near the levels observed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “In 2018, almost nine-in-ten Canadians (88%) were in favour of a mandate.”

In the late 1990s, a study published in the weekly medical journal The Lancet—which has since been discredited and retracted—attempted to link childhood vaccination and autism.

More than a third of Canadians (35%, +4) think there “definitely” or “probably” is a connection between the childhood vaccine for Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) and autism.

While only 30% of women in Canada believe there is a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, the proportion rises to 42% among men.

Half of Canadians (50%, -8) believe every person should be allowed to decide if they want to get vaccinations for seasonal diseases, such as the flu. A slightly smaller proportion (46%, +8) would prefer for the flu vaccine to be mandatory in their province.

More than half of Conservative Party voters in this year’s federal election (58%) think every individual should make the decision on vaccinations for seasonal diseases. The proportions are lower among Canadians who cast ballots for the Liberal Party (44%) and the New Democratic Party (NDP) (42%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from September 10 to September 12, 2025, among 1,003 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.