British Columbia – Research Co.

Surging Conservatives Tie New Democrats in British Columbia

June 8, 2026June 7, 2026By Mario Canseco

Almost half of residents (47%) think the province needs a centre-right party to serve as an alternative to the two dominant ones.

Vancouver, BC [June 6, 2026] – British Columbia’s political scene has tightened following the conclusion of the Conservative Party of BC’s leadership race, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 42% of decided voters (+4 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in October 2025) would support the opposition BC Conservatives in a provincial election, while 42% (-2) would cast a ballot for the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP).

The BC Green Party is third with 9% (-3), followed by Centre BC with 3% (=) and OneBC with 2% (+1).

The BC Conservatives are ahead of the governing party among men (46% to 40%), voters aged 35-to-54 (44% to 39%) and voters aged 18-to-34 (40% to 38%). The BC NDP leads the Official Opposition among women (42% to 39%) and voters aged 55 and over (47% to 42%).

On a regional basis, the BC NDP leads in Southern BC (50% to 41%), Metro Vancouver (43% to 39%) and Vancouver Island (42% to 39%), while the BC Conservatives are first in Northern BC (57% to 23%) and the Fraser Valley (56% to 36%).

“This month, the BC NDP is holding on to 84% (-2) of its voters in the 2024 provincial election,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The retention rate is superior for the BC Conservatives (89%, +11).”

More than half of British Columbians (52%, -7) would “definitely” or “probably” consider casting a ballot for the BC New Democrats in the next provincial election. Consideration is lower for the BC Conservatives (42%, -3), the BC Greens (36%, -7), OneBC (24%, -1) and Centre BC (23%, -5).

The approval rating for Premier and BC NDP leader David Eby has dropped below the 50% threshold (48%, -5). About a third of British Columbians (32%) are satisfied with the way incoming BC Conservative leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay is handling her duties. The numbers are slightly higher for BC Green Party leader Emily Lowan (34%, =) and lower for OneBC leader Dallas Brodie (20%, -6) and Centre BC leader Karin Kirkpatrick (19%, -8).

Just over a third of British Columbians (36%) say they are happy that Findlay was chosen as leader of the Conservative Party of BC—a proportion that rises to 63% among BC Conservative voters in the 2024 provincial election.

Slightly smaller proportions of British Columbians think the Conservative Party of BC is a “free enterprise coalition” (33%, -4 since April 2026) or regard Findlay as a “premier-in-waiting” (30%).

Housing, poverty and homelessness remains the most important issue facing the province (29%, -1), followed by the economy and jobs (26%, +3), health care (21%, -2), crime and public safety (8%, +3), the environment (3%, -3) and accountability (2%, -2).

Almost half of British Columbians (47%, -5) believe the province needs a centre-right party to serve as an alternative to the BC New Democrats and the BC Conservatives, and just over two-in-five (41%) believe it’s time to bring back the BC Liberals as a provincial political party—including 58% of British Columbians who voted for the Liberal Party in the 2025 Canadian federal election.

The survey asked an additional voting intention question in which the BC Liberals were included as a choice. In this scenario, the BC NDP is first with the support of 35% of decided voters, followed by the BC Conservatives (34%), the BC Liberals (15%), the BC Greens (9%), Centre BC (3%) and OneBC (also 3%).

More than one-in-four British Columbians who voted for the federal Liberals in 2025 (27%) would cast a ballot for the BC Liberals in a provincial election.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from June 3 to June 5, 2026, among 803 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Are Pessimistic on Financial Matters

May 28, 2026May 27, 2026By Mario Canseco

Fewer than one-in-five residents expect a recovery for both the province’s economy and their own household’s finances.

Vancouver, BC [May 28, 2026] – Only a third of British Columbians are happy with the economic standing of the province, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 33% of British Columbians rate the economic conditions in the province as “very good” or “good”, while 62% consider them “bad” or “very bad”.

Residents of the province are almost evenly split when assessing their own household’s finances, with 49% saying they are “very good” or “good” and 48% deeming them “bad” or “very bad”.

Positive perceptions of the provincial economy are higher among British Columbians who voted for the BC Green Party (47%) or the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (43%) in the 2024 provincial election than among those who cast ballots for candidates representing the Conservative Party of British Columbia (17%).

Just over two-in-five British Columbians (41%) expect the economic conditions in the province to decline in the next six months, while 38% foresee no change and only 14% predict an improvement.

The assessment is slightly better for household finances, with just over half of British Columbians (51%) predicting no changes, 26% expecting a decline and 16% anticipating an improvement.

About a third of British Columbians (32%) think the provincial economy is worse than that of other Canadian provinces, while 41% consider it “about the same” and 14% claim it is performing better.

Half of British Columbians (50%) expect BC’s economy to improve because of the way the federal government under Mark Carney is treating the province, while 61% agree that many of the setbacks that BC’s economy has experienced can be blamed on the fact that Donald Trump is the President of the United States.

More than three-in-five British Columbians (64%) want the provincial government to devote more resources to expediting permits and dealing with bureaucracy and red tape—a proportion that rises to 75% among BC Conservative voters.

The provincial government’s latest budget projects a $13.3 billion deficit for British Columbia in the 2026-27 fiscal year. When asked their preferred way to deal with the budget deficit, 45% of British Columbians call for cuts to programs, while 33% favour raising taxes and 21% are undecided.

“There is a significant political divide when British Columbians ponder the budget deficit,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Almost half of those who voted for the New Democrats in 2024 (46%) would raise taxes, while more than two thirds of those who supported the BC Conservatives (68%) would cut programs.”

The provincial government has traditionally classified the economy into 13 major sectors. Right now, only five of these sectors garner positive reviews from about half of the province’s residents: tourism (59%), film and television (50%), technology and innovation (also 50%), clean technology (49%) and agriculture (48%).

The level of satisfaction with the way the government is managing eight other sectors is lower: construction (46%), cannabis (also 46%), high technology (45%), fisheries and aquaculture (also 45%), mining (44%), manufacturing (42%), maritime (41%) and forestry (also 41%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from May 12 to May 14, 2026, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Food Security Challenges Affecting Most British Columbians

May 21, 2026May 20, 2026By Mario Canseco

Almost a third of the province’s residents are “more stressed” about having enough money to make it to the end of the month.

Vancouver, BC [May 21, 2026] – Significant proportions of British Columbians are changing their shopping and dietary habits on account of rising food prices, a new Research Co. poll conducted in partnership with United Way BC has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than a third of British Columbians say they have switched packaged food brands to lower priced (generic) alternatives (37%) or changed their diet to avoid products that have become more expensive (35%).

More than one-in-five of the province’s residents (21%) have cut back on lunches for themselves, while fewer have cut back on medications (12%) or cut back on lunches for children (4%).

“Just over two-in-five British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (41%) acknowledge modifying their diet because specific products have become unaffordable,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportion is also noteworthy among British Columbians aged 35-to-54 (36%) and aged 55 and over (28%).”

On a separate question, just under one-in-four British Columbians (23%) say themselves or other household members had to reduce the size of their meals over the past couple of months because of affordability.

While fewer of the province’s residents experienced other issues over the past couple of months, the proportions are noteworthy.

Just under one-in-five British Columbians (18%) report themselves or other household members being unable to afford to eat nutritious meals, and around one-in-seven had to skip meals altogether because of affordability (15%), say that the food that they purchased did not last and they were unable to purchase more (also 15%), or had to access food or meals, at no cost, from a community organization (such as a food bank) (13%).

In addition, three-in-ten British Columbians (30%) say they personally ate less than they felt they should because there wasn’t enough money to buy food, while just under one-in-five (18%) say they personally were hungry but didn’t eat because they couldn’t afford enough food.

More than one-in-five British Columbians who have a senior family member, coworker or friend in the province recall the senior expressing concern about paying for non-essential but important expenses like holiday gifts for others, coffee, or social activities (26%) or the senior expressing concern about paying for everyday living expenses like rent/mortgage, gas for their car, or utilities (also 26%).

Fewer of these respondents recall the senior communicating that they were feeling lonely or isolated (24%), the senior having to reduce the size of their meals, or skip meals, because of affordability (15%) or the senior not being able to afford to eat nutritious meals (12%).

Almost a third of British Columbians (31%) are more stressed now than two years ago about having enough money to make it to the end of the month.

The levels of increased stress are similar among the province’s residents on three other issues: paying their rent or mortgage (29%), feeding themselves and their families (27%) and having enough time to take care of themselves and their families (also 27%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from April 24 to April 26, 2026, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Higher Fines for Interfering with Emergency Vehicles Backed in BC

May 14, 2026May 14, 2026By Mario Canseco

The province’s residents assume that the fines for three violations are significantly higher than they are.

Vancouver, BC [May 14, 2026] – Most British Columbians are in favour of raising the fines levied on drivers who interfere with emergency vehicles, a new Research Co. poll has found.

The online survey of a representative provincial sample asked British Columbians what they think the current fines are for three traffic violations: driving over a fire hose, following a fire truck too closely and failing to yield to an emergency vehicle.

On average, British Columbians believe the current fine for driving over a fire hose is $233.99. Respondents assumed higher fines for following a fire truck too closely ($342.73) and failing to yield to an emergency vehicle ($393.32).

The current fines for these three violations are significantly lower than what British Columbians assumed: $81 for driving over a fire hose, $81 for following a fire truck too closely and $109 for failing to yield to an emergency vehicle.

When informed of the current fines, almost half of British Columbians (48%) think the one in place for failing to yield to an emergency vehicle is too low. More than two-in-five (42%) feel the same way about the fine for following a fire truck too closely and one third (33%) share the same opinion about the fine for driving over a fire hose.

“More than half of men in British Columbia (55%) say the current fine for failing to yield to an emergency vehicle is too low,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Only 43% of women share this view.”

In the final question, three-in-five British Columbians (60%) are in favour of raising the fine for driving over a fire hose. Two thirds (66%) call for a higher fine for following a fire truck too closely, and more than seven-in-ten (72%) endorse a similar course of action for falling to yield to an emergency vehicle.

Support for raising the fine for driving over a fire hose is highest on Vancouver Island (76%), followed by Northern BC (75%), Southern BC (74%), the Fraser Valley (71%) and Metro Vancouver (70%).

Majorities of British Columbians who voted for the BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (77%), the Conservative Party of BC (74%) and the BC Green Party (64%) agree with raising the fine for driving over a fire hose.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from April 6 to April 8, 2026, among 800 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Conservative Leadership Change Heralds Close Election in BC

April 30, 2026April 26, 2026By Mario Canseco

Sizeable majorities of the province’s residents want the Official Opposition to focus on health care and economic growth.

Vancouver, BC [April 30, 2026] – The perceptions of British Columbians on the five contenders in the Conservative Party of BC’s leadership race have not changed dramatically over the past two months, and no candidate would award the party a significant advantage over the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) in a snap election, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, the favourability rating for the five people seeking to lead the Official Opposition is similar. Caroline Elliott is in first place (19%, +6 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in February), followed by Kerry-Lynne Findlay (18%, +4), Peter Milobar (17%, +4), Yuri Fulmer (15%, +3) and Iain Black (14%, =).

At least one-in-five British Columbians who voted for the BC Conservatives in the 2024 provincial election hold favourable views on Elliott (27%, +9), Milobar (25%, +9), Findlay (23%, +7), Black (22%, =) and Fulmer (20%, +4).

The favourability rating is higher for John Rustad, who served as leader of the BC Conservatives from March 2023 to December 2025 (23% among all British Columbians and 39% among BC Conservative voters in 2024).

The “vote consideration” question also shows no decisive frontrunner among all British Columbians. Just under one-in-four say they would “definitely” or “probably” cast a ballot for the BC Conservatives with Milobar (24%, +4) or Elliott (also 24%, +2) as leaders, with slightly lower numbers for Findlay (21%, =), Fulmer (20%, +1) and Black (19%, -1).

When the perceptions of BC Conservative voters in 2024 are assessed exclusively, Milobar is ahead in “vote consideration” with 46% (+13), followed by Elliott (44%, +5), Findlay (41%, +7), Fulmer (38%, +6) and Black (37%, +2).

In head-to-head contests against the BC NDP in a provincial election, Elliott places the BC Conservatives two points ahead of the governing party (23% to 21%). Milobar and Black are one-point ahead (22% to 21% in each matchup), while Findlay and Fulmer are two points behind (23% to 21%, and 22% to 20% respectively).

In each of these five hypothetical scenarios, two-in-five British Columbians (40%) are undecided, support for the BC Green Party fluctuates between 6% and 8%, and CentreBC and OneBC are each below 5%.

When asked what is the most important issue facing the province, 30% of British Columbians (+5 since October 2025) mention housing, homelessness and poverty, followed by the economy and jobs (26%, +4), health care (23%, =) and crime and public safety (7%, +2).

The survey also asked British Columbians about specific issues the Conservative Party of BC should focus on during the next three years.

More than three-in-five respondents want the Official Opposition to get the government to invest more on health care (81%, +1 since March 2025), foster economic growth in all areas of the province (78%, -2), develop a housing policy that rivals what the provincial government is doing (65%, -5) and get more pipelines built and more energy projects approved (61%, +2).

Fewer British Columbians want the BC Conservatives to focus on banning transgender women from taking part in women’s sports leagues competitions (49%, +7), ending “SOGI-Inclusive Education” (44%), repealing the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (DRIPA) (40%) or reverting the ban on plastic straws (37%, +2).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from April 16 to April 18, 2026, among 802 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Ponder Future of Provincial Conservatives

April 27, 2026April 26, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than half think the province needs a centre-right party to serve as an alternative to New Democrats and Conservatives.

Vancouver, BC [April 27, 2026] – British Columbians are divided when asked what the party that is currently serving as the Official Opposition should resemble in the future, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 19% of British Columbians would like the Conservative Party of BC to look like the current Liberal Party of Canada, while 18% want it to be similar to the current Conservative Party of Canada.

Fewer British Columbians would like the BC Conservatives to emulate the BC Liberals (13%), the Progressive Conservatives (10%), Social Credit (5%) or the Reform Party / Canadian Alliance (2%).

“More than two-in-five British Columbians who voted for the provincial Conservatives in 2024 (42%) want the party to look like the federal Official Opposition,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Only 9% think it should attempt to emulate the BC Liberals.”

British Columbians are divided on the legacy of the BC Liberals under Gordon Campbell (1993-2011). While 41% have a favourable opinion of this party, a similar proportion (38%) hold unfavourable views.

The favourability rating is lower for the BC Liberals under Christy Clark (2011-2017) (35%), the BC Liberals under Andrew Wilkinson (2018-2020) (26%) and BC United under Kevin Falcon (2022-2024) (23%).

More than a third of British Columbians (37%, -3 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in March 2025) think the Conservative Party of BC is a “free enterprise coalition”, and almost two-in-five (39%, +5) believe the party’s next leader is a “premier-in-waiting”.

As was the case last year, British Columbians are more likely to trust the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) to stand up to the threats generated by U.S. President Donald Trump (51%, -8) than the opposition Conservative Party of BC (44%, -4).

Most British Columbians (52%, +4) think British Columbia needs a centre-right party to serve as an alternative to the BC New Democrats and the BC Conservatives.

More than three-in-five British Columbians who in 2024 voted for the BC Greens (62%) or the BC Conservatives (61%) would welcome a new centre-right party, along with just over half of those who cast ballots for BC NDP candidates (51%).

Just over two-in-five British Columbians (42%) think it would be a “very good” or “good” idea for the BC NDP and the BC Greens to merge into a single political party.

Support for three other mergers is slightly lower: 39% for a party featuring the BC Conservatives and OneBC, 38% for a party encompassing the BC Conservatives and Centre BC and 38% for a party featuring all three organizations: the BC Conservatives, One BC and Centre BC.

More than one-in-four British Columbians (27%) favour the Conservative Party of BC not running candidates in constituencies where OneBC has nominated a candidate, while 34% are opposed and 39% are not sure.

Respondents to this survey were also asked to choose a position that a political party should take based on five contrasting statements.

Almost four-in-five British Columbians (79%, +4) prefer parties where all members are free to vote individually, and just over seven-in-ten (71%, +1) choose parties that acknowledge and help the less fortunate.

Majorities of the province’s residents also select parties that are anti-American (67%, +3), that advocate for more economic and personal freedoms (64%, =) and that acknowledge Indigenous reconciliation (63%, -3).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

More Than Seven-in-Ten British Columbians Want MLB Team

April 20, 2026April 20, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than half of the province’s residents would attend at least one home game a year when the franchise is established.

Vancouver, BC [April 20, 2026] – Public support for a Major League Baseball (MLB) franchise in Vancouver has grown markedly over the past three years, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than seven-in-ten British Columbians (72%, +12 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in August 2023) say it is a “very good” or “good” idea for Vancouver to have an MLB team.

Fewer than one-in-ten British Columbians (9%, -4) think this is a “bad” or “very bad” idea, while 19% (-8) are not sure.

Sizeable majorities of British Columbians who in 2024 voted for the Conservative Party of BC (76%), the BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (75%) or the BC Green Party (68%) favour establishing an MLB team in Vancouver.

“The arrival of Major League Baseball to Vancouver is backed by two thirds of British Columbians whose heritage is Indigenous (66%) or East Asian (67%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Support is higher among residents of European (70%) or South Asian (82%) descent.”

More than four-in-five residents of the Fraser Valley (83%, +16) think an MLB franchise in Vancouver is a “very good” or “good” idea, along with majorities of British Columbians who live in Southern BC (78%, +21), Metro Vancouver (72%, +12), Northern BC (68%, -10) and Vancouver Island (64%, +7).

More than half of British Columbians (54%, +7) say they are “very likely” or “somewhat likely” to attend at least one home game a year in the event an MLB team is established in Vancouver, and almost three-in-ten (29%, +10) feel the same way about purchasing season tickets.

Just over two thirds of British Columbians in the highest income bracket (68%) say they are likely to go to at least one home game a year once a Vancouver MLB franchise begins operations.

Almost half of British Columbians (48%, +11) are likely to watch the Vancouver MLB team’s games at a bar or pub, while a majority (58%, +2) would tune in to enjoy games at home.

There is also a marked increase in the proportion of residents who would buy apparel or merchandise with the logo of Vancouver’s MLB team, going from 39% in August 2023 to 50% this month.

Three-in-five British Columbians (60%, +19) have a favourite team in MLB, including the Toronto Blue Jays (49%, +17), the Seattle Mariners (7%, +1) and other MLB franchises (4%, +1).

Just over two thirds of British Columbians who have a favourite MLB team (67%, +5) say they would stop rooting for this franchise to support the Vancouver squad once it starts playing.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Low Name Recognition for Leadership Hopefuls in British Columbia

March 5, 2026March 4, 2026By Mario Canseco

Darrell Jones, Caroline Elliott, Kerry-Lynne Findlay, Iain Black and Peter Milobar are slightly ahead on vote consideration.

Vancouver, BC [March 5, 2026] – There is no clear frontrunner when British Columbians—and past BC Conservative voters—assess the 11 candidates who expressed interest in taking over as leader of the Official Opposition in the Legislative Assembly, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 23% of British Columbians say they would “definitely” or “probably” consider voting for the BC Conservatives with former leader John Rustad at the helm.

Only four leadership candidates can count on the consideration of at least one-in-five British Columbians: Darrell Jones (25%), Caroline Elliott (22%), Kerry-Lynne Findlay (21%), Iain Black (20%) and Peter Milobar (also 20%).

The proportions are lower on this question for Sheldon Clare (19%), Yuri Fulmer (also 19%), Bruce Banman (also 19%), Warren Hamm (also 19%), Steve Kooner (17%) and Harman Bhangu (17%). The poll was conducted in February, when Clare and Kooner were still in the running.

Among British Columbians who voted for the BC Conservatives in the 2024 provincial election, Jones and Rustad are tied at 41%, followed by Elliott at 39%, Black at 35%, Findlay at 34% and Milobar at 33%. The numbers are slightly lower for Clare and Fulmer (32% each), Banman (31%), Hamm and Kooner (30% each) and Bhangu (29%).

Just over one-in-five British Columbians (21%) say they have a favourable opinion of Rustad, while 38% hold unfavourable views.

Jones has the highest favourability rating among the 11 original leadership candidates at 20%. The rating for the remaining candidates fluctuates between 11% and 14%.

“Most British Columbians do not know enough about the BC Conservative leadership contenders to have an opinion on them,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Darrell Jones has the highest awareness at 44%, while Warren Hamm and Harman Bhangu have the lowest at 33% each.”

Respondents to this survey were asked if nine issues would be better managed under the current BC New Democratic Party (NDP) government under David Eby or under a BC Conservative government led by Rustad.

A Rustad-led provincial administration is regarded as better positioned to manage the budget deficit (31% to 26%) and crime and public safety (31% to 28%).

The Eby-led BC NDP government is slightly ahead on the economy and jobs (31% to 28%) but holds larger leads on six other areas: housing, homelessness and poverty (31% to 24%), energy (33% to 26%), accountability (33% to 26%), education (36% to 23%), health care (37% to 25%) and the environment (37% to 23%).

On the economy and jobs, men are more likely to express a preference for the Rustad Conservatives (34% to 30%), while women pick the Eby New Democrats (33% to 23%).

The numbers are close on this question among British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (Rustad 28%, Eby 26%) and among those aged 35-to-54 (Rustad 32%, Eby 31%). The current government is clearly ahead among those aged 55 and over (36% to 25%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from February 22 to February 24, 2026, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Endorse Specific Actions to Curb Extortion

February 19, 2026February 18, 2026By Mario Canseco

More than half of the province’s residents are following news related to this issue “very closely” or “moderately closely”.

Vancouver, BC [February 19, 2026] – Residents of British Columbia are paying attention to the recent surge of extortion attempts and extortion-related shootings, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than half of British Columbians (56%) have followed news related to this issue “very closely” or “moderately closely” over the past month.

British Columbians of South Asian descent are more likely to be focused on news related to extortion (67%) than residents whose heritage is Indigenous (59%), European (56%) or East Asian (55%).

At least two thirds of British Columbians are in favour of three separate measures to curb extortion in the province.

Four-in-five British Columbians (80%) agree with expediting the removal of non-citizens charged or convicted of extortion, firearms offences, or participation in extortion-related criminal activity.

Sizeable majorities of British Columbians who voted for the Conservative Party of BC (87%) or the BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (85%) in the 2024 provincial election endorse the plan to expedite the removal of charged non-citizens, along with 73% of those who voted for the BC Green Party.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (72%) support amending the Criminal Code so that adolescents who are recruited to carry out extortion-related activities (such as intimidation and threats) can be tried as adults.

“An extortion-related amendment to the Criminal Code is welcomed by 83% of British Columbians aged 55 and over,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities of residents aged 35-to-54 (69%) and aged 18-to-34 (61%) are also supportive.”

Two thirds of British Columbians (66%) back the appointment of a Commissioner for Extortion Violence Against Canadians—a proportion that rises to 70% among respondents of South Asian descent.

British Columbians are deeply divided when assessing two other proposals.

The notion of providing the City of Surrey with its own dedicated police helicopter is regarded positively by 41% of British Columbians and negatively by 38%.

More than two-in-five British Columbians (45%) disagree with changing gun laws, so that people whose homes or businesses are targeted can defend themselves. A slightly smaller proportion (41%) agree with this idea.

Support for changing gun laws due to extortion attempts and extortion-related shootings is highest in Northen BC (51%), followed by Vancouver Island (48%), the Fraser Valley (47%), Southern BC (40%) and Metro Vancouver (also 40%).

British Columbians who voted for the BC NDP in 2024 are less likely to support changing existing gun laws (40%) than those who cast ballots for candidates representing the BC Conservatives or the BC Greens (each at 45%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from February 7 to February 9, 2026, among 802 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Support for Lower Speed Limits Increases in British Columbia

January 22, 2026January 22, 2026By Mario Canseco

Just over two thirds of respondents would welcome a reduction on all residential streets in their municipality.

Vancouver, BC [January 22, 2026] – British Columbians are open to a major change in the way vehicles are allowed to circulate on specific areas of their municipality, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 68% of British Columbians would personally like to see the speed limit reduced to 30 km/h on all residential streets, while keeping the speed limit on arterial and collector roads at 50 km/h, up five points since a similar Research Co. survey conducted in November 2024.

Residents of the Fraser Valley (71%, +9) are definitely in favour of reducing the speed limit to 30 km/h on all residential streets. Support for the policy is also high in Northern BC (70%, +9), Metro Vancouver (69%, +4), Vancouver Island (64%, +5) and Southern BC (58%, =).

In 2019, Vancouver City Council unanimously passed a motion to establish a pilot project to reduce the speed limit to 30 km/h on select residential streets in the city. In June 2025, Vancouver City Council unanimously approved reducing speed limits on local streets to 30 km/h.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (71%, +4) believe Vancouver’s course of action on residential speed limits is a “very good” or “good” idea.

“Three-in-five British Columbians aged 35-to-54 (60%) think it is a good idea to reduce speed limits on local streets,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Agreement is higher among those aged 55 and over (66%) and those aged 18-to-34 (77%).”

Compared to 2023, there is little change in the perceptions of British Columbians on speeding drivers. Two-in-five (40%, =) report seeing a car circulating above the speed limit of 50 km/h on the street where they live “at least once a day”, while about a third (32%, +2) say this happens “a few times a week”.

British Columbians are also supportive of automated speed enforcement, which works by using cameras or sensors to pick up a vehicle speeding. A ticket is then issued to the owner of the vehicle. Driver’s license points are not issued as the driver of the vehicle cannot be identified.

Speed-on-green intersection cameras, or red light cameras that also capture vehicles that are speeding through intersections, are currently being used in 140 intersections across the province. More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (73%, +1) approve of this type of automated speed enforcement.

Majorities of British Columbians also approve of the use of three other types of automated speed enforcement: fixed speed cameras, which stay in one location and measure speed as a vehicle passes (76%, +5), mobile speed cameras, which can be moved from place to place (68%, +4), and point-to-point enforcement, which uses cameras at two or more distant points on a road to issue tickets to vehicles whose average speed over the distance was excessive (63%, -8).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from January 11 to January 13, 2026, among 800 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Metro Vancouverites Evenly Split on “Mega-Amalgamation”

November 27, 2025November 28, 2025By Mario Canseco

Support is higher for smaller mergers involving fewer cities, particularly those located in the Fraser Valley.

Vancouver, BC [November 27, 2025] – The creation of a “mega-city” encompassing all of Metro Vancouver’s existing municipalities is a contentious proposal, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative regional sample, 42% of Metro Vancouverites think the amalgamation of all municipalities into one is a “very good” or “good” idea, while the same proportion (42%) consider it “bad” or “very bad”.

“Residents of the City of Vancouver boast the highest level of support for the creation of an amalgamated Metro Vancouver (46%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The appetite for full amalgamation drops across all other regions.”

More than two-in-five residents of Surrey and White Rock (44%), the North Shore (43%) and four Fraser Valley municipalities (41%) regard the “mega-city” idea positively. The results are lower in Richmond and Delta (39%) and in Burnaby, New Westminster and the Tri-Cities (32%).

Metro Vancouverites aged 18-to-34 and aged 35-to-54 are more supportive of the creation of a “mega-city” (47% each) than their counterparts aged 55 and over (34%).

The survey also asked Metro Vancouverites about six smaller amalgamation proposals.

Seven-in-ten Metro Vancouverites (70%) think it is a “very good” or “good” idea for the Township of Langley and the City of Langley to merge into one municipality, while 62% feel the same way about a city encompassing Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge.

Residents of these four Fraser Valley municipalities are particularly welcoming of these two amalgamation proposals, with 68% being in favour of uniting the Township of Langley and the City of Langley and 67% supporting a merger involving Pitt Meadows and Maple Ridge.

More than half of Metro Vancouverites (54%) view a possible merger of the City of Surrey and the City of White Rock in a positive light—including 57% of respondents who reside in these two cities.

Just under three-in-five Metro Vancouverites (57%) think it would be a “very good” or “good” idea to combine the City of North Vancouver, the District of North Vancouver, the District of West Vancouver, the Village of Lions Bay and Bowen Island Municipality into a single municipality.

Among residents of these five entities, support for a purported “North Shore” city stands at 47%, with a slightly higher proportion (51%) voicing opposition to the concept.

More than half of Metro Vancouverites (56%) think it would be a “very good” or “good” idea to merge the Village of Anmore. the Village of Belcarra, the City of Coquitlam, the City of Port Coquitlam and the City of Port Moody into one municipality, while fewer than half (47%) would entertain uniting the City of Burnaby and the City of New Westminster.

Residents of these municipalities are not keen on amalgamation, with 44% saying they favour uniting the Tri-Cities and the two villages and 36% supporting a union between Burnaby and New Westminster.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 14 to November 16, 2025, among 1,501 adults in Metro Vancouver. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in Metro Vancouver. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 2.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

High Concern in British Columbia After Cowichan Tribes Ruling

November 24, 2025November 25, 2025By Mario Canseco

Territory acknowledgements are supported by most of the province’s residents; fewer think the word “settler” is adequate.

Vancouver, BC [November 24, 2025] – While a sizeable majority of British Columbians are anxious about a recent court decision, most also express positive views about the right of self-determination for Indigenous peoples and find territory acknowledgements adequate, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 44% of British Columbians say they are following news related to the recent B.C. Supreme Court decision “very closely” or “moderately closely”.

The B.C. Supreme Court ruled that the Cowichan Tribes had “established Aboriginal title” to more than 5.7 square kilometres of land in Richmond and stated that Aboriginal title is a “prior and senior right” to other property interests, regardless of whether the land in question is public or private.

More than two thirds of British Columbians (68%) think property owners in British Columbia should be concerned about the consequences of the court’s decision, including 79% of those aged 55 and over and 75% who own their primary residence.

More than half of British Columbians (52%) believe all negotiations related to Aboriginal title agreements in British Columbia should be paused until the Cowichan Tribes case is settled.

Fewer than half of British Columbians agree with two other statements: that fee simple title in private property should always be superior to Aboriginal title (47%) and that the B.C. Supreme Court’s recent decision erases private property ownership (45%).

Just under half of British Columbians (48%)—and 45% of property owners—say they believe the Cowichan Tribes when they say they are not looking to displace any individual from the properties they own.

Most British Columbians (54%) think the City of Richmond took the correct course of action by sending an official letter to property owners in the claimed area, warning them that the decision “may compromise the status and validity” of their ownership. Fewer than three-in-ten British Columbians (27%) think the City of Richmond overreacted to the situation.

Across the province, more than a third of respondents (35%) had heard about the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)—a proportion that rises to 62% among those of Indigenous descent.

UNDRIP establishes global standards for the rights of Indigenous peoples. It outlines collective and individual rights, such as self-determination, and the right to maintain distinct cultures, languages and institutions.

The UNDRIP Act, which came into effect in June 2021, requires the Canadian government to ensure all laws are consistent with the Declaration, in consultation with Indigenous peoples, and mandates the creation of an action plan to achieve the Declaration’s objectives.

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (73%) think the UNDRIP Act is a positive development for Canada, while 14% perceive it negatively and 13% are undecided.

More than two thirds of British Columbians (68%) say territory acknowledgements are adequate in today’s Canada, while 18% consider the practice inadequate.

“At least two thirds of residents of the Fraser Valley (69%), Metro Vancouver (69%) and Southern BC (66%) think territory acknowledgements are adequate,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Majorities in Vancouver Island (61%) and Northern BC (59%) also share this view.”

The practice of non-Indigenous Canadians and Permanent Residents calling themselves “settlers” is seen as adequate by 45% of British Columbians and as inadequate by 30%.

The public is divided on whether people should speak positively about the Residential School system, with 39% believing this is adequate and 43% claiming it is inadequate.

More than three-in-five British Columbians (63%) think the right of self-determination—meaning that Indigenous people can determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and dispose of and benefit from their wealth and natural resources—has been positive for Canada.

Similar proportions of British Columbians think First Nations and Indigenous organizations across British Columbia should decide what type of housing projects can be built on their territories (66%) and if natural resource projects can be established on their territories (62%).

More than two-in-five British Columbians think that, compared to 20 years ago, First Nations and Indigenous organizations are doing better on cultural development (50%), economic development (49%) and social development (44%).

Economic Reconciliation is defined as “the process of making economic amends for historical injustices to Indigenous Peoples.” British Columbians are divided in their assessment of the current situation, with 23% saying the federal government is doing “too much” on Economic Reconciliation, while 27% believe it “needs to do more”.

Equal proportions of British Columbians think the provincial government is doing “too much” (24%) or “needs to do more” (also 24%) on Economic Reconciliation. Only 18% of respondents think municipal administrations are doing “too much” on this file.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 18 to November 20, 2025, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Assess Options for BC Conservatives

November 13, 2025November 12, 2025By Mario Canseco

Dianne Watts, Christy Clark, Gavin Dew, Elenore Sturko and Aaron Gunn do best in test of 15 possible leadership contenders.

Vancouver, BC [November 13, 2025] – Five politicians would allow the Conservative Party of BC to provide a serious challenge to the governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) in a British Columbia provincial election, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In early October, the BC NDP held a six-point advantage over the BC Conservatives among decided voters in British Columbia

The early November online survey of a representative provincial sample asked British Columbians how they would vote in an election with 15 different options leading the Conservative Party of BC.

With former Surrey Mayor and MP Dianne Watts as leader, the BC Conservatives would be tied with the BC NDP at 21% among all voters.

The official opposition would trail the governing party by just one point under the leadership of former premier Christy Clark (26% to 25%) or current Kelowna-Mission MLA Gavin Dew (20% to 19%).

The BC Conservatives would be two points behind the BC New Democrats under two other leaders: Surrey-Cloverdale MLA Elenore Sturko (23% to 21%) and North Island—Powell River MP Aaron Gunn (20% to 18%).

The BC NDP would have four-point leads over the BC Conservatives under the leadership of Port Coquitlam Mayor Brad West (25% to 21%) or former Transportation Minister Todd Stone (20% to 16%).

The BC Conservatives would trail the BC New Democrats by five points under former BC Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson (23% to 18%), current MP Ellis Ross (21% to 16%) and former BC United West Vancouver-Capilano candidate Caroline Elliott (23% to 18%).

The lead for the BC NDP is larger if the BC Conservatives are commanded by Kamloops Centre MLA Peter Milobar (24% to 18%), 2024 West Vancouver-Sea to Sky candidate Yuri Fulmer (25% to 19%) and former MP and federal cabinet minister James Moore (24% to 16%).

The two worst performing prospective candidates tested are Bryan Breguet, who ran unsuccessfully for the BC Conservatives in Vancouver-Langara in 2024 (23% to 14%), and Langley-Abbotsford MLA Harman Bhangu (25% to 14%).

More than a third of British Columbians (36%, +3 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2024) place themselves at the centre of the political spectrum. Fewer residents of the province say they are centre right, right or extreme right (28%, -2) or centre left, left or extreme left (21%, -1).

When asked about the province’s political parties, more than half of British Columbians (53%, +1) say the BC NDP is centre left, left or extreme left, while almost two thirds (64%, +3) consider the BC Conservatives as centre right, right or extreme right.

The BC Green Party is regarded as centre left, left or extreme left by 45% of British Columbians (+2). CentreBC is placed in the middle of the spectrum by a third of the province’s residents (with 39% saying they are not sure), while OneBC is regarded as centre right, right or extreme right by 23% of British Columbians (with 49% saying they are not sure).

The five party leaders yielded results that mirrored the parties they represent. BC Premier and BC NDP leader David Eby is considered centre left, left or extreme left by just over half of British Columbians (51%, +3), while 62% (+4) say BC Conservative leader John Rustad is centre right, right or extreme right.

BC Green leader Emily Lowan is regarded as centre left, left or extreme left by 42% of British Columbians. One-in-four of the province’s residents (25%) say Centre BC leader Karin Kirkpatrick is a centrist, while 19% believe Dallas Brodie of OneBC is centre right, right or extreme right. Sizeable proportions of British Columbians do not know enough about Kirkpatrick (48%) or Brodie (51%) to place them on the spectrum.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 24 to October 26, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Back Foreign Real Estate Purchase Ban

October 23, 2025October 22, 2025By Mario Canseco

More than three-in-five (62%) want municipal governments to dismantle encampments or “tent cities”.

Vancouver, BC [October 22, 2025] – Residents of British Columbia continue to overwhelmingly support the federal government’s decision to ban foreigners from purchasing real estate in Canada, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 74% of British Columbians agree with the decision to ban non-Canadians (with exclusions for international students and temporary residents) from purchasing residential properties in Canada until 2027, up four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in February 2024.

“The federal ban on foreign ownership of real estate is not a contentious issue in British Columbia,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The policy is endorsed by sizeable majorities of the province’s residents whose heritage is Indigenous (82%), South Asian (78%), European (76%) or East Asian (67%).”

More than half of British Columbians (57%, +8) think the provincial government was right to implement a $400 renters’ credit for households earning up to $63,000 a year. Support for this policy reaches 63% among British Columbians who rent.

More than a third of British Columbians (37%, +8) call on the like the provincial government to cancel the home owner grant, which reduces the amount of property tax people pay for their principal residence.

More than three-in-five British Columbians continue to voice support for two ideas: the federal government tying immigration numbers to affordable housing targets and new housing starts (66%, +1) and municipal governments immediately dismantling any encampment or “tent city” located within their municipality (62%, =).

This month, support for dismantling “tent cities” is highest in Metro Vancouver (66%, +7), followed by the Fraser Valley (62%, -4), Vancouver Island (56%, -6), Northern BC (53%, -4) and Southern BC (50%, -1).

For the first time since June 2020, more than half of British Columbians (54%, +13) expect the actions of the provincial government to be effective in making housing more affordable in British Columbia.

Majorities of British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (59%) and aged 35-to-54 (56%) are optimistic about the actions of the provincial government, along with 46% of their counterparts aged 55 and over.

The housing policies implemented during the tenure of John Horgan as Premier of British Columbia remain popular in 2025. At least two thirds of the province’s residents endorse increasing the foreign buyers tax from 15% to 20% (74%, =), expanding the foreign buyers tax to areas located outside of Metro Vancouver (73%, +2), introducing a “speculation tax” in specific urban areas targeting foreign and domestic homeowners who pay little or no income tax in BC, and those who own second properties that aren’t long-term rentals (70%, +1), increasing the property transfer tax from 3% to 5% for homes valued at more than $3 million (66%, +4) and introducing a tax of 0.2% on the value of homes between $3 million and $4 million, and a tax rate of 0.4% on the portion of a home’s value that exceeds $4 million (also 66%, +4).

A set of policies brought forward after David Eby took over as Premier are also backed by majorities of British Columbians, including building more modular supportive homes in areas where people are experiencing homelessness (73%, -2), capping rent increases in 2025 at 3% (70%, +4), implementing a three-business-day protection period for financing and home inspections (66%, -3), raising the fines for short-term rental hosts who break local municipal by-laws to $3,000 per day per infraction (65%, -4), removing strata rental restrictions (58%, +6), ending most strata age restrictions (also 58%, -2) and banning homeowners from operating a short-term rental business unless it is located on their principal residence and/or on a different unit on their property (56%, -2).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 13 to October 15, 2025, among 802 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Almost Half of British Columbians Would Feel Less Safe if They Were Jewish

October 7, 2025November 25, 2025By Mario Canseco

Three-in-four of the province’s residents say Canadian Jews are being unfairly targeted for what is happening in Israel and Gaza.

Vancouver, BC [October 7, 2025] – On the eve of the terrorist attack on a synagogue in Manchester, UK, and the second anniversary of the attack on Israel that spawned the current conflict in the Middle East, almost half of British Columbians say they would feel “less safe” today than two years ago if they were Jewish, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 48% of British Columbians say they would feel “much less safe” or “somewhat less safe” than two years ago if they were Jewish Canadians living in Canada today—a proportion that rises to 55% among those aged 55 and over.

Practically four-in-five British Columbians (79%, +3 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in March) say they are “very concerned” or “moderately concerned” about antisemitism, or rising prejudice against Jewish Canadians.

Larger proportions of British Columbians are worried about three other issues: protestors targeting Jewish neighbourhoods and Jewish-owned businesses (83%, +6), aggressive behaviour by Pro-Palestinian protestors (86%, +5) and attacks, including gunfire and firebombs, on synagogues, Jewish schools and businesses (also 86%, +6).

Three-in-four British Columbians (75%, +8) agree that Canadian Jews are being unfairly targeted for what is happening in Israel and Gaza.

Two thirds of British Columbians (66%) describe some of the protest and graffiti incidents that have targeted Jewish-owned businesses and places of worship as antisemitic and going beyond legitimate protest, while just 19% feel the messaging is not antisemitic and fairly reflects anger about Israel’s actions.

“More than three-in-four British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (76%) feel the statements of some protestors have been antisemitic,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “At least three-in-five of their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (63%) and aged 55 and over (60%) feel the same way.”

When it comes to actions to address antisemitism, more than four-in-five British Columbians support three measures: increasing penalties for crimes, including vandalism and graffiti, targeting specific groups (82%), preventing government funding from going to organizations that promote hate, including antisemitism (also 82%) and supporting training for police and public servants to recognize antisemitism (81%).

At least two thirds of British Columbians support three other measures: strengthening Canada’s hate speech laws (78%), requiring education about antisemitism in Canadian schools (74%) and providing public funding for Holocaust and antisemitism education programs (66%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from August 24 to August 26, 2025, among 815 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

NDP Leads, Conservatives Drop, Greens Gain in British Columbia

October 6, 2025October 5, 2025By Mario Canseco

David Eby has a 16-point lead over John Rustad when British Columbians ponder who would make the “Best Premier”.

Vancouver, BC [October 6, 2025] – The governing BC New Democratic Party (NDP) is ahead of all challengers in British Columbia’s political scene, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, 44% of decided voters would cast a ballot for the BC NDP candidate in their constituency, up one point since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June.

The Conservative Party of BC is in second place with 38% (-4), followed by the BC Green Party with 12% (+4), Centre BC with 3% (+1) and OneBC with 1%.

The BC New Democrats hold a sizeable lead over the BC Conservatives among decided voters aged 55 and over (54% to 35%). The race is closer among decided voters aged 35-to-54 (BC Conservatives 40%, BC NDP 38%) and is tied among decided voters aged 18-to-34 (40% for each party).

On a regional basis, the BC Conservatives are leading in Northern BC (52%) and the Fraser Valley (52%), while the BC NDP is first in Vancouver Island (51%), Southern BC (50%) and Metro Vancouver (44%),

“The BC NDP is holding on to 86% of the voters who supported them in the October 2024 provincial election,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The retention rate is lower for the BC Conservatives (78%) and the BC Greens (74%).”

Practically three-in-five British Columbians (59%, +5) say they would “definitely” or “probably” consider voting for the BC NDP in the next provincial ballot. Fewer of the province’s residents are actively considering casting a ballot for the BC Conservatives (45%, -2), the BC Greens (43%, +6), Centre BC (28%, +9) and OneBC (25%).

This month, 53% of British Columbias (-3) approve of the performance of David Eby as Premier and leader of the BC NDP. The rating is lower for Official Opposition and Conservative Party of BC leader John Rustad (37%, =) BC Green Party leader Emily Lowan (34%), Centre BC leader Karin Kirkpatrick (27%, +11) and OneBC leader Dallas Brodie (26%).

On the “Best Premier” question, Eby holds a 16-point lead over Rustad (37% to 21%), with Lowan at 12%, Kirkpatrick at 4% and Brodie at 2%. Almost one-in-four British Columbians (24%) are undecided.

Three-in-ten British Columbians (30%, -4) say housing, poverty and homelessness is the most important issue facing the province, followed by the economy and jobs (23%, +1), health care (23%, +2), crime and public safety (5%, -1), the environment (6%, +3) and accountability (4%, =).

When asked which of the main party leaders is better suited to handle specific issues, Eby is ahead of Rustad on seven of them: education (44% to 26%), the environment (43% to 24%), health care (41% to 28%), housing, poverty and homelessness (40% to 28%), energy (40% to 29%), the economy and jobs (38% to 31%) and accountability (37% to 30%).

The two leaders are tied on who would be best to manage crime and public safety (34% each).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 1 to October 3, 2025, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Still Committed to $10aDay Child Care

September 18, 2025September 17, 2025By Mario Canseco

The public is divided on the idea of families reducing expenses and keeping a parent at home if child care is not available.

Vancouver, BC [September 18, 2025] – A sizeable proportion of British Columbians would like to see more action on the child care file, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than four-in-five British Columbians (82%) think it is “very important” or “moderately important” that the provincial government continues to deliver on its commitment to build a quality, flexible $10aDay child care system that’s accessible to families across the province.

Since 2018, the provincial government has been investing in building a quality $10aDay child care system in the province. The investment includes fee reductions for families, more licensed child care spaces, and wage enhancements for early childhood educators.

Only 21% of British Columbians have not heard anything about this plan. Almost half (47%) have heard all about the $10aDay child care system, while just over three-in-ten (31%) have heard about some of the investments.

More than four-in-five British Columbians agree that child care is important to support working parents (85%) and that having children today costs a lot more than it did 40 years ago (83%).

More than seven-in-ten British Columbians (72%) would like to see child care become publicly available like elementary schools. A slightly larger proportion voices support for government investments in more in flexible child care programs for parents who work outside of 9-5, Monday to Friday (74%).

Practically four-in-five British Columbians (79%) agree that, when child care is affordable and available to parents, more mothers can go to work and pay taxes.

British Columbians are divided on the notion of most families not needing child care services if they reduced their expenses so that one parent could afford to stay at home. Similar proportions of respondents across the province either agree (46%) or disagree (45%) with the statement.

“Most British Columbians of Indigenous and South Asian descent (65% and 52% respectively) believe it is relatively easy for a family to reduce expenses if child care is not available,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Only 42% of British Columbians of European and East Asian heritage share this view.”

There is also a split when British Columbians are asked to ponder if grandparents should help with child care more, to reduce the cost for parents, with 46% of residents agreeing with the statement and 43% disagreeing with it.

More than half of British Columbians aged 55 and over (52%) disagree with the idea of grandparents helping with child care more, compared to 37% of those aged 35-to-54 and 39% of those aged 18-to-34.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from August 28 to August 30, 2025, among 801 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.5 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Amid Threats, British Columbians Would Maximize Food Production

September 3, 2025September 2, 2025By Mario Canseco

More than three-in-four British Columbians (78%) would increase the amount of food grown, processed and packaged on the ALR.

Vancouver, BC [September 3, 2025] – Sizeable proportions of British Columbians support modifications to the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR), a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than seven-in-ten British Columbians (73%) think British Columbia should maximize the food production use of ALR land, including land of poor soil quality that is currently not farmable, unfarmed, or used for agricultural purposes.

The ALR in British Columbia is a provincial zone where agriculture is the priority use. A significant portion of the ALR is currently unfarmed or not actively used for agricultural purposes.

Majorities of British Columbians who voted for the Conservative Party of BC (74%), the BC New Democratic Party (NDP) (76%) and the BC Green Party (79%) are in favour of maximizing the food production use of ALR land.

BC Consumers rely heavily on fruit and vegetables that are grown in the United States. Climate change has reduced the amount of arable land in the U.S., and the second presidency of Donald Trump in the has led to the imposition of new tariffs.

More than three-in-four British Columbians (78%) are “very worried” or “moderately worried” about BC’s food security being threatened and want the province to take immediate steps to increase the amount of food grown, processed and packaged on the ALR.

“Environmental and political concerns about food security are prevalent across British Columbia,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Sizeable proportions of residents of Vancouver Island (85%), the Fraser Valley (80%), Metro Vancouver (78%), Northern BC (78%) and Southern BC (77%) are worried.”

Some Industry and Farm Groups argue that allowing food processing facilities on ALR land could increase local value added food production and diversify farmer incomes. Others worry this could lead to too much manufacturing activity on farm lands.

When presented with the two arguments, seven-in-ten British Columbians (70%) support allowing food processing facilities on ALR land—a proportion that rises to 76% on Vancouver Island and to 80% in Northern BC.

Three-in-four British Columbians (75%) think the provincial government should require Food Processors to source at least 50% of their food inputs from BC Growers when and if seasonally available.

Soils in BC are classified from 1-7, with Classes 1-3 being the most arable and Classes 4-7 being the least arable. Just under half of British Columbians (48%) would limit food processing to the least arable soils, while more than three-in-ten (31%) would allow food processing throughout the ALR.

Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from August 9 to August 11, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Back Tough Limits on Smoking and Vaping

August 7, 2025August 7, 2025By Mario Canseco

More than seven-in-ten of the province’s residents would ban smoking and vaping in multi-family buildings.

Vancouver, BC [August 7, 2025] – Significant proportions of British Columbians think the current regulations related to the use of tobacco, marijuana and e-cigarettes across the province are appropriate, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than four-in-five British Columbias agree with existing bans on smoking in all public and private kindergarten to Grade 12 schools (88%) and smoking in indoor public spaces, public transit facilities and workplaces (including restaurants, bars, and casinos) (87%).

Sizeable proportions of British Columbians also endorse guidelines that forbid smoking in private vehicles occupied by children (81%) and smoking in parks, park areas, seawalls and beaches (67%).

The results are very similar when British Columbians ponder the same guidelines for the use of electronic cigarettes. Practically nine-in-ten (88%) agree with banning vaping in all public and private kindergarten to Grade 12 schools.

Support is also high for regulations that ban vaping in indoor public spaces, public transit facilities and workplaces (84%), in private vehicles occupied by children (81%) and in parks, park areas, seawalls and beaches. (66%).

At this moment, there is no province-wide regulation that addresses smoking or vaping in multi-family buildings. More than three-in-four British Columbians (77%) are in favour of a ban on smoking (tobacco and marijuana) in multi-family buildings, while just under three-in-four (73%) would forbid vaping in multi-family buildings.

Across the province, almost one-in-four British Columbians (23%) say they smoked marijuana over the course of the past year, while just under one-in-five smoked tobacco in any form (19%) or consumed marijuana in a non-smoking form (also 19%).

Fewer British Columbians used an electronic cigarette or e-cigarette (15%) or consumed tobacco in a non-smoking form (5%).

“Vaping remains particularly popular among British Columbians aged 18-to-34, with almost one-in-four (23%) using an electronic cigarette in the past year,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The incidence of tobacco smoking is very similar across all three age groups.”

Half of British Columbians (50%) say they would not consider dating a person who smoked marijuana—a proportion that rises to 67% among those of South Asian heritage and to 64% among those of East Asian descent.

Larger proportions of British Columbians say they would not consider dating a person who vaped (57%) or who smoked tobacco (62%).

Almost two thirds of women (65%) say they would not consider dating a tobacco smoker, while 67% of British Columbians who voted for the BC Green Party in last year’s provincial election would not consider dating someone who used electronic cigarettes.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from July 13 to July 15, 2025, among 814 adults in British Columbia. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in British Columbia. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

British Columbians Back Mandatory Voting and Spring Ballots

July 24, 2025July 23, 2025By Mario Canseco

Only 37% of the province’s adult residents would grant voting rights to individuals who are 16 and 17 years old.

Vancouver, BC [July 24, 2025] – While most British Columbians would welcome specific changes to provincial electoral processes, the level of support for relying on a different system to elect the members of the Legislative Assembly is low, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative provincial sample, more than three-in-four British Columbians (77%) say it should be mandatory for candidates to attend at least one public debate in their riding with the candidates from other parties.

More than half of British Columbians are in favour of three other ideas: making voting mandatory in all BC provincial elections (61%), holding provincial elections in May (56%) and declaring provincial election day a public holiday (54%).

British Columbians elect the members of the Legislative Assembly through a system called First-Past-The-Post, where a candidate wins a constituency by receiving more votes than any others.

Almost two thirds of British Columbians (65%) say they are satisfied with the First-Past-The-Post electoral system, while 21% are dissatisfied and 13% are not sure.

Dissatisfaction with First-Past-The-Post is highest on Vancouver Island (29%), followed by Southern BC (24%), the Fraser Valley (also 24%) Metro Vancouver (20%) and Northern BC (15%).

The survey also asked British Columbians if they would like to see the implementation of three distinct electoral systems for provincial elections.

Almost half of British Columbians (47%) would like to elect all members of the Legislative Assembly through Party-List Proportional Representation. Public support is lower for two other systems: Single Transferable Vote system (43%) and Mixed Member Proportional Representation (40%).

Only 10% of British Columbians think people who don’t vote in provincial elections should be punished, through fines, while just under two-in-five (38%) believe those who do cast ballots in provincial elections should be rewarded, through tax incentives. Almost half of respondents (45%) think neither idea is appealing.

“Offering tax incentives to people who vote in provincial elections is an attractive idea for almost half of British Columbians aged 18-to-34 (49%) and aged 35-to-54 (48%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Their counterparts aged 55 and over are decidedly more skeptical (21%).”

At this point, only Canadian citizens aged 18 and over can vote in provincial elections. More than half of British Columbians (57%) agree with allowing Permanent Residents—or individuals aged 18 and over who have been granted the right to live and work in Canada permanently, but are not yet Canadian citizens—to cast ballots in provincial elections.

Support is decidedly lower for extending voting rights to three other groups: British Columbians who would qualify as Canadian citizens under current regulations when they turn 18, but who are 16 and 17 years old (37%), Foreign Students (27%) and Temporary Workers (26%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.