Canada – Page 3 – Research Co.

“Merry Christmas” Gaining as Preferred Greeting in Canada

December 22, 2025December 27, 2025By Mario Canseco

Three-in-ten Canadians believe this year’s holiday season will be “more stressful than fun”.

Vancouver, BC [December 22, 2025] – For the first time in six years, more than two thirds of Canadians express a fondness for a particular greeting of the season, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 67% of Canadians say they prefer “Merry Christmas”, up five points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in December 2024.

Fewer than one-in-five Canadians (18%, -6) are partial to “Happy Holidays” as a greeting, while 16% (+2) are not sure or don’t care either way.

More than seven-in-ten Atlantic Canadians (77%) and Albertans (72%) choose “Merry Christmas”, along with majorities of respondents who reside in British Columbia (68%), Ontario (67%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (66%) and Quebec (59%).

Almost four-in-five Canadians who voted for the Conservative Party in this year’s federal election (79%) prefer “Merry Christmas” as a greeting. The proportions are lower among Canadians who cast ballots for the Liberal Party (63%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (51%).

More than half of Canadians (52%, -1) expect this year’s holiday season to be more fun than stressful, while three-in-ten (30%) believe it will be more stressful than fun.

“More than a third of Generation X members in Canada (34%) foresee a stressful holiday season,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Fewer Millennials (31%), Generation Z (29%) and Baby Boomers (27%) share this feeling.”

Expectations of a stressful holiday season are more prevalent in Atlantic Canada (38%), followed by Alberta (34%), Ontario (33%), British Columbia (30%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (24%) and Quebec (23%).

When asked about some staples of the holiday season, more than four-in-five Canadians (82%, -3) say they like turkey, while almost two thirds (65%, -3) enjoy cranberry sauce.

Fewer Canadians are fond of Brussels sprouts (59%, -1), fruit cake (58%, =), egg nog (55%, -4), mince pies (49%, =), plum pudding (44%, -3) and mulled wine (36%, -4).

While half of Baby Boomers (50%) like plum pudding, the proportions are lower among members of Generation X (42%), Millennials (41%) and Generation Z (39%).

Egg nog is liked by more than half of respondents in Alberta (64%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (63%), Atlantic Canada (58%), Ontario (56%) and British Columbia (55%). In Quebec, only 47% of residents concur.

Respondents to this survey were also asked how old they were when they learned “the truth” about Santa Claus. Most Canadians (56%) realized at age 9 or younger, while fewer than three-in-ten (28%) found out at age 10 or older.

Canadians aged 18-to-34 are more likely to have found out “the truth” about Santa Claus after their 10th birthday (33%) than their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (31%) and aged 55 and over (21%).

For a majority of Canadians (52%), the appropriate time for children to learn “the truth” about Santa Claus is age 9 or younger, but more than a third (36%) think the revelation should take place at age 10 or older.

Half of Atlantic Canadians (50%) say “the truth” about Santa Claus should be told to children after they turn 10. Fewer residents of Ontario (43%), Alberta (39%), British Columbia (32%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (37%) and Quebec (23%) share this view.

More than seven-in-ten Canadians (72%) acknowledge being satisfied with the way their parents and/or caregivers managed conversations about “the truth” when it comes to Santa Claus, while 13% are dissatisfied.

On this question, dissatisfaction is higher among Canadians aged 18-to-34 (20%) than among those aged 35-to-54 (14%) and those aged 55 and over (7%).

On a regional basis, Ontario is home to the largest proportion of dissatisfied respondents on the way parents and/or caregivers handled conversations about Santa Claus (16%), followed by Quebec (15%), Atlantic Canada (14%), Alberta (also 14%), British Columbia (10%) and Saskatchewan and Manitoba (9%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from December 7 to December 9, 2025, among a representative sample of 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Practically Two Thirds of Canadians Targeted by Cyber Scams

December 18, 2025December 17, 2025By Mario Canseco

While “phishing” emails are the primary nuisance, young Canadians are more susceptible to setbacks using public Wi-Fi.

Vancouver, BC [December 18, 2025] – Only 35% of Canadians have not endured any of seven problems related to cybersecurity in the past three years, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 38% of Canadians say they received a “phishing” email, where somebody attempted to acquire their personal information by masquerading as a trustworthy entity.

Just over a third of Canadians (34%) received an email offering them money for their help or assistance, in what is sometimes referred to as “Nigerian scam”, in the past three years.

Fewer than one-in-five Canadians say their computer became infected with a virus while they were browsing the Internet (17%), somebody hacked their social media platform (16%) or somebody hacked their email address (12%).

Fewer than one-in-ten Canadians faced two more drastic setbacks: somebody attempted to apply for a loan or open a line of credit using their name (9%) or somebody attempted to receive a tax refund using their name (6%).

More than two-in-five Canadians aged 35-to-54 and aged 55 and over (42% each) recall receiving a phishing email in the past three years. Almost one-in-four Canadians aged 18-to-34 (24%) experienced a hacking on social media.

About half of Canadians say they have checked their email (52%) or used social media (48%) while accessing Wi-Fi in public places, such as airports, cafes, transit hubs or university campuses.

Fewer Canadians relied on public Wi-Fi to access websites for news and information (34%), stream video content (30%), do online banking (26%), make online purchases (23%) or pay utility bills (14%).

“Canadians aged 18-to-34 are more likely to rely on public Wi-Fi to bank, purchase things and make service payments than their older counterparts,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Very few Canadians aged 55 and over follow the same course of action.”

When asked about the level of trust they have on various entities to properly store and manage their personal data, almost four-in-five Canadians (78%) are “very confident” or “moderately confident” in their bank.

Majorities of Canadians feel the same way about their regional health authority (74%), their utility provider (70%), their telephone provider (68%), the federal government (63%), municipal governments (62%) and their provincial government (60%).

The level of confidence is lower—but still in majority territory—for each of these entities to properly deal with a cyberattack data breach.

Banks are once again at the top of the list (70%), followed by regional health authorities (62%), the federal government (also 62%), telephone providers (61%), provincial governments (59%), utility providers (also 59%) and municipal governments (54%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 21 to November 23, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Americans “Turn to God” More Often Than Canadians

December 11, 2025December 24, 2025By Mario Canseco

Deaths and health setbacks are more likely to move people in each country towards faith and spirituality.

Vancouver, BC [December 11, 2025] – Americans are significantly more likely than Canadians to be drawn to faith and spirituality when facing challenges in their lives, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

The online survey of representative national samples asked Canadians and Americans if they sought faith and spirituality “more than usual” when going through eight different experiences.

More than seven-in-ten Americans (71%) and just under three-in-five Canadians (59%) say they became more in tune with faith and spirituality after the loss of a loved one.

Majorities of respondents in the two countries (64% in the United States and 53% in Canada) sought faith and spirituality when they experienced an unexpected health setback.

At least half of Americans became more in tune with faith and spirituality when they encountered financial problems (55%), after the birth of a loved one (53%) or when experiencing career-related setbacks, such as failing to get admission to a university, losing a job or not being hired after an interview (50%).

In Canada, about two-in-five respondents acknowledged becoming more in tune with faith and spirituality on account of the birth of a loved one (42%), financial problems (41%) or career-related setbacks (38%).

While almost half of Americans (46%) turned to faith and spirituality upon the end of a relationship, only 36% of Canadians followed the same course of action when going through a break-up, separation or divorce.

“Only 33% of Canadian men and 41% of American men looked more closely at faith and spirituality after a break-up,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions rise to 40% among Canadian women and to 51% among American women.”

Fewer Americans and Canadians sought faith and spirituality during the COVID-19 pandemic (44% in the U.S. and 32% in Canada) or after the re-election of Donald Trump as President of the United States (35% in the U.S. and 20% in Canada).

Just under a third of Republicans in the United States (32%) became more in tune with faith and spirituality after Trump’s re-election, compared to 35% of Independents and 41% of Democrats.

In Canada, similar proportions of people who voted for the Liberal Party (21%), the Conservative Party (20%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (19%) in the 2025 federal election sought faith and spirituality after Trump’s victory.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from November 21 to November 23, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada and 1,001 adults in the United States. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in each country. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, for each country.

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Similar Views on Animals in Canada and the United States

December 4, 2025December 5, 2025By Mario Canseco

Vancouver, BC [December 4, 2025] – Few residents of Canada and the United States voice support for two practices related to animals, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of representative national samples, only 19% of Americans (-6 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2020) and 16% of Canadians (-1 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in July 2024) are in favour of killing animals for their fur.

“There is a significant gender gap when it comes to killing animals for their fur in the Canada and the United States,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “While 25% of American men and 22% of Canadian men see no problem with this practice, only 12% of women in each of the two countries feel the same way.”

On a regional basis, acceptance of killing animals for their fur in Canada is highest in Atlantic Canada (22%) and Saskatchewan and Manitoba (also 22%), followed by British Columbia (17%), Ontario (16%), Quebec (15%) and Alberta (13%).

In the United States, the results on this question are steady across all four census regions: South (20%), West (19%), Northeast (18%) and Midwest (17%).

In Canada, similar proportions of respondents of four different ethnicities are in favour of killing animals for their fur: Indigenous (17%), East Asian (16%), European (also 16%) and South Asian (14%).

Just under one-in-four African Americans (24%) are in favour of killing animals for their fur. The proportions are lower among respondents in the United States who are white (18%) or Hispanic (14%).

There are two issues where there is a sizeable difference between the two countries.

The use of animals in rodeos is endorsed by 41% of Americans (-5) and 25% of Canadians (-1).

More than half of Americans who identify as Republicans (56%) are in favour of using animals in rodeos, compared to 39% among Independents and 32% among Democrats.

In Canada, just over a third of people who voted for the Conservative Party in this year’s federal election (34%) see no problem with using animals in rodeos. The proportions are lower among those who cast ballots for the Liberal Party (22%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (15%).

While more than half of Americans (52%, -12) favour keeping animals in zoos and aquariums, only 34% of Canadians (-2) concur.

Once again, political allegiance plays a role in public perceptions. More than three-in-five Republicans (63%) are in favour of keeping animals in zoos and aquariums, compared to just under half of Democrats (48%) and Independents (47%).

In Canada, support for keeping animals in zoos and aquariums is highest among Conservative voters (38%), followed by Liberals (33%) and New Democrats (25%).

Just over one-in-five Americans (21%, -4) are in favour of hunting animals for sport, compared to only 12% (+1) of Canadians.

Republicans in the United States are more likely to voice support for hunting animals for sport (30%) than Independents (19%) or Democrats (16%). The political fluctuations are not as deep in Canada, with similar proportions of residents who voted for the Conservatives (14%), the Liberals (11%) and the New Democrats this year (also 11%) being in favour of trophy hunting.

The views of residents are significantly different on hunting animals for meat, with three-in-five Canadians (60%, =) and two thirds of Americans (66%, -1) favouring this practice.

American men (75%) and Canadian men (67%) are more supportive of hunting animals for meat than American women (56%) and Canadian women (55%).

Almost seven-in-ten respondents in the two countries (69% each) are in favour of eating animals. In each country, the proportion of supporters is highest among residents aged 55 and over (72% in Canada and 73% in the United States).

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Teaching Creationism in Schools Gains Backers in Canada

November 20, 2025November 25, 2025By Mario Canseco

A majority of Canadians still believe human beings evolved from less advanced life forms over millions of years.

Vancouver, BC [November 20, 2025] – The proportion of Canadians who think there is a place for creationism in their province’s classrooms has increased over the past year and a half, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 48% of Canadians (+7 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in April 2024) think creationism—the belief that the universe and life originated from specific acts of divine creation—should be part of the school curriculum in their province.

More than a third of Canadians (35%, -7) disagree with teaching creationism to school children, while 18% (+1) are not sure.

“The increase in support for discussing creationism in schools is being driven by Canadians aged 18-to-34 (58%, +10),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Fewer than half of their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (48%, +4) and aged 55 and over (38%, +5) favour this course of action.”

Men (51%, +7) are still more likely than women (44%, +10) to endorse creationism in the classroom. On a regional basis, support for this idea is highest in Ontario (54%, +10), followed by Atlantic Canada (50%, +2) Saskatchewan and Manitoba (50%, +8), Alberta (46%, +3), Quebec (43%, +8) and British Columbia (41%, +4).

More than half of Canadians who voted for the Liberal Party (53%, +16) or the Conservative Party (52%, +6) in this year’s federal election agree with teaching creationism in schools. The proportion is lower among Canadians who cast ballots for the New Democratic Party (NDP) (38%, -5).

Majorities of Canadians whose origins are South Asian (73%, +11) or Indigenous (57%, +7) support discussing creationism in the classroom. Fewer Canadians whose heritage is East Asian (45%, -11) or European (35%, +1) concur.

The year-to-year fluctuations are not as pronounced on the other question included in the survey. Just over three-in-five Canadians (61%, -3) say human beings evolved from less advanced life forms over millions of years, while just under one-in-four (23%, +2) believe God created human beings in their present form within the last 10,000 years.

More than one-in-four Canadians aged 55 and over (26%, +1) side with divine creation, along with more than one-in-five Canadians aged 35-to-54 (22%, +1) and aged 18-to-34 (21%, +1).

Fewer than one-in-four Canadians of four different ethnicities assert that God created human beings: European (22%, +3), East Asian (21%, -3), Indigenous (19%, +10) and South Asian (17%, -2%).

Almost three-in-ten Canadians who supported the Conservatives in this year’s federal election (29%, +3) are also believers in divine creation, compared to about one-in-five Liberals (21%, +4) and New Democrats (19%, -1).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 24 to October 26, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Fewer Than One-in-Five Canadians View Trump Favourably

November 6, 2025November 19, 2025By Mario Canseco

The proportion of positive impressions has dropped for Wayne Gretzky and Don Cherry; Stephen Harper outranks Justin Trudeau.

Vancouver, BC [November 6, 2025] – Very few Canadians look fondly at the current President of the United States, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, only 18% of Canadians have a favourable opinion of Donald Trump, while just over three-in-four (76%) hold unfavourable views.

Positive views on Trump reach 21% in Alberta and 20% in Ontario. Fewer residents of British Columbia (18%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (also 18%), Atlantic Canada (17%) and Quebec (16%) concur.

“More than one-in-four Canadians who voted for the Conservative Party this year (27%) regard Donald Trump favourably,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are lower among those who supported the New Democratic Party (NDP) (14%) or the Liberal Party (10%).”

Fewer than one-in-four Canadians have a favourable opinion of South African billionaire Elon Musk (21%) and psychologist and media commentator Jordan Peterson (23%).

Musk’s unfavourability reaches 77% among Canadian women, while Peterson is an unknown entity for 44% of Canadians aged 55 and over.

Fewer than a third of Canadians hold positive views on British broadcaster Piers Morgan (30%) and international activist Greta Thunberg (32%).

Morgan’s favourability rating reaches 40% among Conservative voters in Canada. Almost half of Liberal voters (47%) hold positive views on Thunberg.

When asked about Canada’s previous two prime ministers, Canadians provide a higher favourability rating to Stephen Harper, who served from 2006 to 2015 (47%), than to Justin Trudeau, who served from 2015 to 2025 (39%).

Harper’s positives reach 51% among men, 52% among Canadians aged 55 and over and 59% among residents of Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

Trudeau’s favourability is highest among women (43%), Canadians aged 55 and over (46%) and Quebecers (44%).

In the realm of hockey, Canadians are more likely to hold favourable views on Mario Lemieux (50%, -17 since May 2023) than on Wayne Gretzky (47%, -29) and Don Cherry (42%, -3).

Gretzky and Cherry get their best numbers in Alberta (58% and 55% respectively), while Lemieux does particularly well in Quebec (55%).

More than one-in-five Canadians aged 18-to-34 (22%) do not know who Cherry is. The proportions are lower among Canadians aged 35-to-54 (12%) and aged 55 and over (6%).

More than half of Canadians have a favourable opinion of two actors: Mike Myers (53%) and Ryan Reynolds (58%).

Positive views on Reynolds reach 61% among men and 56% among women. Myers gets particularly high ratings from Canadians aged 35-to-54 (59%) and aged 55 and over (58%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians Remain Satisfied with Scope of MAID Legislation

October 30, 2025October 29, 2025By Mario Canseco

The proportion of residents who would completely ban medical assistance in dying jumped by six points since 2023.

Vancouver, BC [October 30, 2025] – The perceptions of Canadians on the existing guidelines that allow medical assistance in dying have not gone through severe fluctuations over the past two years, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 52% of Canadians are satisfied with the regulations, up four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in April 2023.

Equal proportions of Canadians are either dissatisfied with the rules related to medical assistance in dying (24%, -3) or are undecided (also 24%, -1).

“Fewer than half of Conservative Party voters in the 2025 federal election (46%) are content with Canada’s medical assistance in dying laws,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are higher among those who cast ballots for New Democratic Party (NDP) (53%) or Liberal Party (59%) candidates.”

Canadians of East Asian descent are the least likely to endorse the status quo on medical assistance in dying (47%). Satisfaction is higher among Canadians whose heritage is European (51%), South Asian (58%) or Indigenous (60%).

More than three-in-five Quebecers (62%) endorse the current guidelines that allow a person to seek medical assistance in dying. The proportions are lower in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (52%), Atlantic Canada (51%), British Columbia (also 51%), Ontario (49%), and Alberta (45%).

When asked about their personal feelings, almost three-in-five Canadians (58%, =) believe medical assistance in dying should be allowed, but only under specific circumstances.

Similar proportions of Canadians think medical assistance in dying should either never be allowed (18%, +6) or always be permitted (16%, -4).

Three-in-four Canadians (75%, +2) support an individual being permitted to seek medical assistance in dying in Canada if these conditions are met:

Being eligible for health services funded by the federal government, or a province or territory (or during the applicable minimum period of residence or waiting period for eligibility).
Being at least 18 years old and mentally competent.
Having a grievous and irremediable medical condition.
Making a voluntary request for medical assistance in dying that is not the result of outside pressure or influence.
Giving informed consent to receive medical assistance in dying.

Under the current legislation, only an adult with a grievous and irremediable medical condition can seek medical assistance in dying in Canada.

Fewer than half of Canadians are willing to expand the scope of existing legislation to allow medical assistance in dying in cases of inability to receive medical treatment (49%, -2), disability (46%, -4), mental illness (42%, -1), homelessness (26%, -2) or poverty (25%, -2).

Practically half of Canadians (49%, +7) believe anyone who helps a person to commit suicide should be prosecuted, while just over three-in-ten (31%, -3) disagree and one-in-five (20%, -3) are not sure.

Canadians aged 18-to-34 are more likely to think that aiding a person to commit suicide should remain a criminal offence (60%, +8) than their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (48%, +7) and aged 55 and over (41%, +7).

Canadians remain divided when asked about the appropriate punishment for a parent who is found guilty of assisting a terminally ill son or daughter to die.

Just under three-in-ten Canadians (28%, -1) express a preference for a prison sentence at the discretion of a judge, while15% (+7) think the crime calls for a mandatory sentence of life imprisonment.

Just over one-in-ten (11%, -3) think the actions in this case can be dealt with through a fine and no time in prison, while just under one-in-four Canadians (23%, -1) choose no penalty at all.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from October 15 to October 17, 2025, among 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Affairs and Drugs Among the Least Acceptable Actions in Canada

October 16, 2025October 15, 2025By Mario Canseco

Contraception, divorce and pre-marital relations have the largest levels of moral acceptability across the country.

Vancouver, BC [October 16, 2025] – Fewer than one-in-five Canadians think marital infidelity and the use of illegal drugs can be characterized as “morally acceptable” behaviours, a new Research Co. poll has found.

The online survey of a representative national sample asked Canadians whether they considered 21 different issues as “morally acceptable” or “morally wrong.”

Fewer than one-in-four Canadians believe seven of the issues tested are “morally acceptable”: polygamy (21%, +4 since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2024), suicide (20%, +3), cloning animals (19%, =), married men and/or women having an affair (18%, +2), using illegal drugs (also 18%, +4), cloning humans (12%, -1) and paedophilia (8%, +3).

“Almost one-in-four Canadian men (23%) think marital infidelity is morally acceptable,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportion is decidedly lower (13%) among Canadian women.”

There is a significant regional divide on this question. Practically one-in-four Quebecers (24%) have no moral qualms about married people having an affair. Fewer than one-in-five residents of all other regions feel the same way.

Two-in-five Canadians (40%, =) think the death penalty is “morally acceptable.” Fewer Canadians feel the same way about four other issues: buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur (38%, +4), pornography (31%, +3), prostitution (28%, +3) and medical testing on animals (25%, +2).

While almost half of Canadian men (46%) think it is “morally acceptable” to buy and wear clothing made of animal fur, only 30% of Canadian women concur.

At least half of Canadians think five other issues are “morally acceptable”: abortion (56%, -2), medical research using stem cells obtained from human embryos (55%, =), physician-assisted death (54%, -3), sexual relations between two people of the same sex (also 54%, -1) and gambling (50%, +1).

Gambling is regarded as a “morally acceptable” practice by majorities of Canadians whose origins are East Asian (60%) or Indigenous (56%). The proportions are decidedly lower among Canadians of European (30%) or South Asian (22%) heritage.

The four issues that find the largest levels of moral acceptability across Canada are all related to human interaction: contraception (73%, -3), divorce (70%, -2), sexual relations between an unmarried man and woman (67%, -3) and having a baby outside of marriage (62%, -5).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from September 10 to September 12, 2025, among 1,003 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Upward Trend for Mandatory Vaccinations for Children in Canada

October 9, 2025October 9, 2025By Mario Canseco

A third of Albertans (34%) believe all decisions on inoculation belong to parents.

Vancouver, BC [October 9, 2025] – There has been a sizeable increase in the level of support for mandatory vaccinations for childhood diseases—such as polio or measles—in Canada, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 72% of Canadians think vaccinations for children should “definitely” or “probably” be mandatory in their province, up five points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in October 2024.

Just under one-in-four Canadians (23%, -6) believe parents should “definitely” or “probably” be the ones deciding whether their children should be vaccinated.

A third of respondents in Alberta (34%, =) reject any mandate related to childhood vaccinations. The proportions are lower in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (22%, -8), Ontario (also 22%, -6), Quebec (21%, -10), British Columbia (also 21%, -9) and Atlantic Canada (19%, -9).

“While support for mandatory childhood vaccinations increased to 72% in 2025, it is still nowhere near the levels observed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “In 2018, almost nine-in-ten Canadians (88%) were in favour of a mandate.”

In the late 1990s, a study published in the weekly medical journal The Lancet—which has since been discredited and retracted—attempted to link childhood vaccination and autism.

More than a third of Canadians (35%, +4) think there “definitely” or “probably” is a connection between the childhood vaccine for Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) and autism.

While only 30% of women in Canada believe there is a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, the proportion rises to 42% among men.

Half of Canadians (50%, -8) believe every person should be allowed to decide if they want to get vaccinations for seasonal diseases, such as the flu. A slightly smaller proportion (46%, +8) would prefer for the flu vaccine to be mandatory in their province.

More than half of Conservative Party voters in this year’s federal election (58%) think every individual should make the decision on vaccinations for seasonal diseases. The proportions are lower among Canadians who cast ballots for the Liberal Party (44%) and the New Democratic Party (NDP) (42%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Americans More Likely to Swear in Conversation Than Canadians

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025By Mario Canseco

Similar proportions of Canadians (43%) and Americans (38%) “always” alter how they speak to avoid swearing.

Vancouver, BC [October 2, 2025] – Swear words are more likely to find their way into the conversations of Americans than the conversations of Canadians, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of representative national samples, more than half of Canadians (57%) say they swear “frequently” or “occasionally” when talking to friends, down one point since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2023.

Fewer Canadians admit to swearing in conversations with relatives (43%, =), co-workers (35%, -4) and strangers (23%, -3).

Conversely. more than half of Americans swear “frequently” or “occasionally” when talking to friends (64%) and relatives (51%). Smaller proportions of respondents in the United States also rely on swear words during conversations with co-workers (47%) and strangers (33%).

“Only 22% of Canadians and 20% of Americans aged 55 and over swear at work,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions rise to 43% in Canada and 64% in the United States among those aged 18-to-34.”

Majorities of Canadians say they hear other people swear “frequently” or “occasionally “when talking with friends (71%, -1), relatives (57%, +2), co-workers (54%, +2) and strangers (51%, -1). The proportions are markedly higher in the United States during conversations with friends (74%), relatives (65%), co-workers (60%) and strangers (59%).

In Canada, 43% of respondents (-1) claim to “always” alter the way they speak to make sure they do not swear in public, while a similar proportion (42%, -2) say they “sometimes” alter the way they speak so as not to swear in front of certain people.

Americans are more likely to say they “sometimes” alter their language to avoid swearing (49%) than to “always” partake in this behaviour (38%).

Only 15% of Canadians and 13% of Americans say they “never” alter the way they speak and if a swear word comes out, they do not worry about it.

Canadians who voted for the Conservative Party this year are slightly more likely to say they “never” alter their language in a public conversation (16%) than those who supported the Liberal Party (14%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (11%).

In the United States, Republicans are more likely to say they “never” alter the way they speak (16%) than Independents (14%) or Democrats (7%).

Respondents to this survey were asked to type in the swear word they say the most. Fewer than one-in-five Canadians (17%) and Americans (13%) claim to either not swear at all or lack a favourite word.

In Canada, only two words reached double digits: “f*ck” (41%, +1) and “sh*t” or “m*rd*” (22%, -1). In the United States, “f*ck” was also at the top of the list (37%), followed by “sh*t” (24%) and “d*mn” (13%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from June 30 to July 2, 2025, among 1,001 adults in Canada and 1,000 adults in the United States. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in each country. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20, for each country.

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Economic Confidence Rises in Canada, But Inflation Worries Persist

September 25, 2025September 24, 2025By Mario Canseco

There is a significant gap when Canadians aged 55 and over assess Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre.

Vancouver, BC [September 25, 2025] – While most Canadians believe the country’s financial standing is not ideal at this point, there has been a marked increase in positive perceptions over the past five months, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 62% of Canadians say the economic conditions in Canada are “poor” or “very poor” today, down six points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in April.

More than a third of Canadians (35%, +6) rate the country’s economic conditions as “very good” or “good”.

Almost half of respondents in Atlantic Canada (49%) rate Canada’s current financial situation positively. The proportions are lower in Quebec (43%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (40%), Ontario (36%), British Columbia (29%) and Alberta (28%).

Equal proportions of Canadians predict that the Canadian economy will decline (39%, -4) or remain the same (also 39%, +8) in the next six months, while just 15% (-1) expect an improvement.

In spite of the positive momentum on the country’s economic standing, inflation concerns continue to be prevalent across the country. More than three-in-four Canadians (76%, +1) expect to pay more for a week’s worth of groceries in the next six months, and two thirds foresee higher prices for a new car (68%, -2) and gasoline (67%, +15).

Smaller proportions of Canadians—yet still majorities—predict higher prices for a new television set (55%, -2) and real estate (52%, =) in the next six months.

There is little change on the question related to personal finances, with 50% of Canadians (+1) saying their situation is “very good” or “good” and 47% (-1) deeming it “poor” or “very poor”.

Compared to April, there is a noticeable decrease in the proportion of Canadians who have worried “frequently” or “occasionally” about specific financial setbacks.

About half of Canadians have been concerned about the safety of their savings (50%, -5) and the value of their investments (49%, -6) in the past couple of months. Fewer than two-in-five have worried “frequently” or “occasionally” about unemployment affecting their household (39%, -4), being able to pay their mortgage or rent (also 39%, -4), or their employer running into serious financial trouble (32%, -5).

“More than half of Canadians aged 18-to-34 (52%) have worried about making their mortgage or rent payments,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The level of concern is only slightly lower among their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (46%).”

Two-in-five Canadians (40%, +5) trust Governor of the Bank of Canada Tiff Macklem to do the right thing to help the economy.

The numbers did not move significantly for the country’s top federal leaders, with a majority of Canadians (58%, -1) trusting Prime Minister Mark Carney on economic management, and more than two-in-five (44%, +1) expressing the same view about federal opposition leader Pierre Poilievre.

As was the case in April, most Canadians aged 55 and over (63%), aged 18-to-34 (57%) and aged 35-to-54 (52%) trust Carney to do the right thing to help the economy. Poilievre’s numbers on this question are best with Canadians aged 18-to-34 (49%) and aged 35-to-54 (48%), but drop among those aged 55 and over (37%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Liberal Lead Shrinks as Canadians Refocus on Domestic Issues

September 15, 2025September 14, 2025By Mario Canseco

Finances and housing push Canada-U.S. Relations to third place on the list of national concerns.

Vancouver, BC [September 15, 2025] – Support for the governing Liberal Party is not as strong across Canada as it was during the summer, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 43% of decided voters would support the Liberal candidate in their riding, down four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in July.

The Conservative Party is second with 38% (+1), followed by the New Democratic Party (NDP) with 8% (+2), the Bloc Québécois with 6% (=), the Green Party with 2% (=), the People’s Party with 1% (=) and other parties and independent candidates also with 1% (=).

The Liberals remain ahead of the Conservatives in British Columbia (49% to 36%) and Ontario (48% to 39%). The two parties are now in a statistical tie in Atlantic Canada (39% to 37%).

The Conservatives hold massive leads over the Liberals in Alberta (56% to 32%) and Saskatchewan and Manitoba (55% to 34%). In Quebec, the Liberals are in first place with 43%, followed by the Bloc with 28% and the Conservatives with 23%.

Male decided voters are almost evenly split between the Liberals and the Conservatives (41% to 40%), while female decided voters prefer the governing party over the official opposition (45% to 36%).

The Liberals are the top choice of decided voters who are members of Generation Z (46%) and Silent Generation / Baby Boomers (52%). The Conservatives hold the upper hand among Generation X (46%) and Millennials (44%).

Practically one-in-four Canadians (24%, +3) regard the economy and jobs as the most important issue facing the country, followed by housing, homelessness and poverty (22%, +4), Canada-U.S. Relations (17%, -5), health care (11%, -2) and immigration (10%, -1).

“Canadians aged 55 and over are still primarily concerned about Canada-U.S. Relations (26%),” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Those aged 35-to-54 are more likely to be focused on the economy and jobs (26%), while those aged 18-to-34 are mainly preoccupied with housing (27%).”

The approval rating for Prime Minister and Liberal leader Mark Carney fell by five points, from 61% in July to 56% this month. The results on this question remain lower for Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre (47%, +3), Green leader Elizabeth May (33%, -1), interim NDP leader Don Davies (28%, +2), Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet (26%, -2) and People’s Party leader Maxime Bernier (22%, +1).

Carney holds a 13-point advantage over Poilievre on the “Preferred Prime Minister” question (44% to 31%), with the remaining party leaders in single digits.

When asked which of the two main party leaders would be the best to handle 11 different issues, Carney remains ahead of Poilievre on eight of them: foreign affairs (49% to 30%), Canada-U.S. Relations (47% to 31%), accountability and leadership (46% to 31%), national unity (44% to 28%), the economy and jobs (44% to 35%), health care (42% to 32%), the environment (41% to 25%) and energy and pipelines (39% to 34%).

Poilievre leads Carney as the best person to manage crime and public safety (39% to 35%). The two leaders are practically tied on two other issues: housing, homelessness and poverty (Carney 37%, Poilievre 35%) and immigration (Poilievre 38%, Carney 37%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Half of Canadians Perceive Artificial Intelligence as a Threat

September 11, 2025September 14, 2025By Mario Canseco

Only one-in-four believe the technology should continue to be developed as quickly as possible.

Vancouver, BC [September 11, 2025] – The perceptions of Canadians on artificial intelligence (AI) have become more negative over the past two years, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 50% of Canadians regard AI is “a threat” to humanity, up four points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in September 2023.

More than a third of Canadians (37%, -3) think AI is an opportunity for humanity, while 13% (-1) are not sure.

Canadians aged 35-to-54 are less likely to regard AI as a threat (46%) than their counterparts aged 55 and over (51%) and aged 18-to-34 (53%).

Almost half of Canadians in the highest income bracket (46%) think AI is an opportunity for humanity. Fewer Canadians in the middle (36%) and lowest (29%) income brackets feel the same way.

Almost half of Canadians (49%, -6) believe we should slow down the development of AI, while one-in-four (24%, +4) believe the technology should continue to be developed as quickly as possible. Only 13% of Canadians (=) would prefer to abandon the development of AI altogether.

There are some staggering regional differences on this question. The proportion of Canadians who favour developing AI as quickly as possible is highest in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (40%), followed by Quebec (26%), British Columbia (24%), Ontario (23%) and Alberta (22%). In Atlantic Canada, only 8% of residents support this course of action.

Fewer than three-in-five Canadians (56%, -4) say they have followed news stories about AI “very closely” or “moderately closely” over the past 12 months—including 66% of those aged 18-to-34 and 60% of Quebecers.

Practically four-in-five Canadians express concerns about AI taking over jobs currently performed by humans (79%, +2) and AI leading to less intelligent students at schools of universities (79%, +6). Just over seven-in-ten Canadians (71%, +1) are worried about AI causing an event that leads to the loss of human life.

More than half of Canadians say they trust doctors and nurses (61%, -1) and universities (54%, -5) to develop and manage AI. The confidence rating is lower for tech executives (40%, =), the federal government (38%, +4), provincial governments (also 38%, +5), business executives and CEOs (30%, +6) and international governments (29%, +7).

“The generational divide on the tech sector as a developer and manager of AI is staggering in Canada,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “While 52% of Canadians aged 18-to-34 trust tech executives for this endeavour, the rating drops to 39% among those aged 35-to-54 and to 30% among those aged 18-to-34.”

Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from June 30 to July 2, 2025, among 1,001 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty..

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Generational Split on Communications Evident in Canada and U.S.

September 8, 2025September 8, 2025By Mario Canseco

About three-in-ten people aged 18-to-34 in each country would prefer to break up with a person without an in-person meeting.

Vancouver, BC [September 8, 2025] – The preferred modes of communication for Canadians and Americans vary greatly with age and gender, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of representative national samples, roughly half of Americans (50%) and Canadians (48%) say they feel anxious when they have to make a phone call to a person they do not know.

Fewer than two-in-five Canadians and Americans aged 55 and over (35% and 38% respectively) express anxiety upon the prospect of a telephone conversation with a stranger. The proportions are markedly higher among Canadians and Americans aged 35-to-54 (53% and 57% respectively) and aged 18-to-34 (58% and 57% respectively).

Canadians (51%) are more likely than Americans (43%) to find text messages or emails impersonal.

Only 39% of Canadians aged 18-to-34 feel text messages and emails are an impersonal form of communication. The proportion is higher among their counterparts aged 35-to-54 (43%) and aged 55 and over (46%).

In the United States, the trend is similar. Americans aged 55 and over are more likely to find text messages or emails impersonal (56%) than those aged 35-to-54 (49%) and aged 18-to-34 (47%).

Americans (54%) are more likely than Canadians (47%) to say they would have no problem giving a speech in front of other people.

Fewer than half of Canadian and American women (40% and 43%) express confidence in successfully addressing an audience. Most men claim they would have no problem doing this (54% in Canada and 64% in the United States).

At least seven-in-ten Canadians and Americans believe two tasks that require communication need to be performed in person: ending a relationship (78% in Canada and 79% in the United States) and quitting a job (70% in Canada and 74% in the United States).

“Just over one-in-five Canadians (22%) and Americans (21%) would prefer to break up with a person by phone, text message, email or app,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “These proportions rise among those aged 18-to-34 (29% in Canada and 32% in the United States).

Americans rely at roughly the same rate on apps (39%) and telephone calls (34%) to order food delivery to their home. Canadians are more likely to use an app (47%) than to place a phone call (33%) to a restaurant.

Just over two-in-five Canadians (41%) would make a phone call to ask a question to their bank, while fewer would show up in person (32%). The results are similar in the United States, with 43% of Americans preferring a phone call and 37% preferring to complete this task in person.

The results differ greatly by country on the preferred way to ask a question to a municipality or City Hall. Canadians are more likely to send an email (35%) or make a phone call (33%) than to show up in person (21%). Americans are evenly split on using the phone (36%) or showing up in person (34%), with significantly fewer (19%) preferring an email.

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Support for Continuation of Legal Abortion Access Rises in Canada

August 21, 2025August 20, 2025By Mario Canseco

Most Liberal and NDP voters see no problem with the health care system funding the procedure, while Conservatives are skeptical.

Vancouver, BC [August 21, 2025] – Practically half of Canadians believe there should be no changes to the legality of pregnancy termination in Canada, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 49% of Canadians believe abortion should be legal under any circumstances, up three points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in August 2024.

More than a third of Canadians (37%, +2) say abortion should be legal only under certain circumstances, while fewer than one-in-ten (8%, +1) believe the procedure should be illegal in all circumstances.

Majorities of women (52%), Canadians aged 55 and over (55%) and Quebecers (58%) believe abortion should be legal under any circumstances.

Most Canadians who voted for the Liberal Party (61%) or the New Democratic Party (NDP) (54%) in this year’s federal election would not challenge the legality of abortion. Only 36% of Conservative Party voters concur with this rationale, while almost half (48%) would allow the procedure only under certain circumstances.

“Over the past seven years, support for the complete abolition of abortion in Canada has only reached double digits once, in 2022,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Even among Conservative voters, the proportion of respondents who would completely outlaw abortion is low (11%).”

More than three-in-five Canadians (62%, +4) think there is no point in re-opening a debate about abortion in Canada right now.

About one-in-four Canadians (24%, +1) believe a debate about abortion is long overdue in Canada and the discussion should be re-opened, while 14% (-6) are not sure.

Responses are more nuanced on a separate question. More than a third of Canadians (35%, -1) think the health care system should only fund abortions in the event of medical emergencies, while more than two-in-five (44%, -2) believe the health care system should fund abortions whenever they are requested.

Just over one-in-ten Canadians (11%, +4) would prefer for the health care system not to fund abortions at all.

Women (49%) are more likely to support the current funding structure for abortions than men (38%).

More than half of Quebecers (51%) agree with the health care system funding abortions upon request. The proportions are lower in Ontario (45%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (also 45%), Atlantic Canada (43%), British Columbia (41%) and Alberta (30%).

While majorities of Liberal and NDP voters (54% and 51% respectively) are in favour of the health care system funding abortions whenever they are requested, only 32% of Conservative voters share this view.

Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from August 9 to August 11, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Views on Immigration in Canada Fluctuate Widely by Age

August 14, 2025August 13, 2025By Mario Canseco

Just over half of those aged 55 and over (51%) think fewer legal immigrants should be allowed to relocate in Canada.

Vancouver, BC [August 14, 2025] – The overall perceptions of Canadians on immigration have not gone through a significant shift since 2024, but a generational divide is evident, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 43% of Canadians believe immigration is having a mostly positive effect in the country, up one point since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in June 2024.

A smaller proportion of Canadians (39%, -5) think immigration is having a mostly negative effect in the country, while 18% (+4) are undecided.

Majorities of Canadians who voted for the New Democratic Party (NDP) (59%) or the Liberal Party (55%) in this year’s federal election believe immigration is having a positive effect. The proportion is decidedly lower among those who cast ballots for Conservative Party candidates (27%).

More than half of British Columbians (52%) say immigration has been mostly positive for Canada. The proportions are lower in Quebec (49%), Alberta (44%), Ontario (40%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (35%) and Atlantic Canada (30%).

Just over two-in-five Canadians (41%, -5) would like to see a decrease in the number of legal immigrants who are allowed to relocate in Canada, while just over one third (34%, +3) would maintain the current levels and 16% (+1) would increase them.

More than half of Canadians aged 55 and over (51%) call for a decrease in immigration levels, along with 40% of those aged 35-to-54 and 30% of those aged 18-to-34.

“By a 7-to-1 margin, Canadians aged 55 and over prefer a decrease in legal immigration levels over an increase,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The gap is significantly closer among their younger counterparts.”

Half of Canadians of European descent (50%) would like to reduce legal immigration to Canada. The proportions are lower among Canadians whose ancestry is Indigenous (36%), South Asian (28%) and East Asian (26%).

Just over thirds of Canadians (68%, +2) believe the hard work and talent of immigrants makes Canada better, while a similar proportion (66%, +1) think immigrants should only be allowed in Canada if they adopt Canadian values.

Canadians are still divided when asked to select either of two concepts. Two-in-five (40%, -4) endorse the mosaic, where cultural differences within Canadian society are valuable and preserved, while a slightly larger proportion (44%, +2) favours the melting pot, where immigrants assimilate and blend into Canadian society.

The melting pot is the preferred choice for men (48%), Canadians aged 35-to-54 (47%), Albertans (also 47%) and British Columbians (45%).

The mosaic is particularly popular among NDP voters (58%), but drops in popularity among Liberals (47%) and Conservatives (28%).

Methodology: Results are based on an online study conducted from July 26 to July 28, 2025, among 1,000 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Canadians Grow Pessimistic on Eradicating Homelessness

July 31, 2025July 30, 2025By Mario Canseco

Just over three-in-four support increasing temporary housing options and incentivizing developers to build affordable units.

Vancouver, BC [July 31, 2025] – Canadians have become less optimistic about an eventual solution to homelessness in the country, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 55% of Canadians think that, with the proper funding and policies, homelessness can “definitely” or “probably” be eradicated in Canada, down six points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in February 2024.

Two-in-five Canadians (40%, +5) think homelessness will “definitely” or “probably” always be a problem in Canada, even with the proper funding and policies.

“Seven-in-ten Canadians aged 18-to-34 (70%) are hopeful about a solution to homelessness,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are lower among those aged 35-to-54 (56%) and those aged 55 and over (41%).”

The survey outlines significant drops in the perceived urgency of the current state of affairs. More than half of Canadians (55%, -11) describe the situation related to homelessness in the country as a “major problem”.

Compared to last year, fewer Canadians think homelessness is a “major problem” in their province (48%, -13), their municipality (34%, -8) and their neighbourhood (21%, -5).

More than half of Canadians say homelessness has increased in the country (59%, -12) and their province (55%, -12) over the past three years. The proportions are lower for perceived increases in homelessness in their municipality (39%, -12) and their neighbourhood (28%, -9).

For the first time, a majority of Canadians (51%, +5) agree with municipal governments immediately dismantling any encampment or “tent city” located within their municipality.

Public support for other ideas is decidedly higher. At least three-in-five Canadians agree with changing zoning laws to allow property owners to build more units on standard lots (62%, -3) and with devoting tax money to build units to house homeless residents (68%, -2).

More than three-in-four Canadians endorse three other possible solutions: offering incentives to developers if they focus on building affordable housing units (76%, +1), increasing temporary housing options for people experiencing homelessness (also 76%, -3) and increasing mental health support for residents who require assistance (78%, -3).

More than half of Canadians (53%, -3) believe the federal government has done a “bad” or “very bad” job coming up with solutions to deal with homelessness, while 32% (+1) rate its performance on this file as “very good” or “good”.

More than a third of Canadians (36%, +1) think their provincial government is managing homelessness well. Among the four most populous provinces, the rating is highest in Ontario (39%, +10), followed by Quebec (35%, -4), Alberta (also 35%, +1) and British Columbia (29%, -4).

There is no nationwide change on the perception of municipal governments, with 39% of Canadians (=) saying they have done a “very good” or “good” job to come up with solutions to deal with homelessness.

More than two in five Canadians think two factors are to blame “a great deal” for the current situation regarding homelessness in Canada: lack of affordable housing (45%, -5) and addiction and mental health issues (44%, -2).

Fewer residents place “a great deal” of the blame on poverty and inequality (35%, -5), a bad economy and unemployment (30%, -3), personal actions and decisions (25%, -1) and family and emotional trauma (20%, -4).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Majorities in Canada and USA Endorse Political Correctness

July 17, 2025July 16, 2025By Mario Canseco

Re-dubbing movies and printing new editions of books to remove “offensive” words gets a thumbs down in both countries.

Vancouver, BC [July 17, 2025] – Public support for the concept of “political correctness” is on the rise in both Canada and the United States, a new two-country Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of representative national samples, 59% of Canadians and 53% of Americans are in favour of relying on “political correctness” in their respective countries.

The term “political correctness” has been used to describe language and/or behaviour that seeks to minimize possible offenses to racial, cultural and gender identity groups, among others.

“The trendline for political correctness is clear in Canada, jumping from 50% in 2020 to 55% in 2022 and to 59% in 2025,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “In the United States, we are back at the proportion first observed in 2020 (53%), after a severe decline in 2022 (45%).”

Hostility towards “political correctness” reaches 48% among Americans aged 55 and over, but stands at 30% among their Canadian counterparts.

Politically, 44% of Independents and 43% of Republicans in the United States reject the concept of “political correctness”, along with 45% Canadians who voted for the Conservative Paty in the 2025 federal election.

More than half of Canadians (56%, +1) and Americans (58%, +7) reject printing new editions of books that remove words that may be deemed offensive to a specific race or ethnicity.

Opposition is similar to re-dubbing movies to remove words that may be deemed offensive to a specific race or ethnicity, with most Canadians (55%, -1) and Americans (57%, -7) decrying the practice.

Conversely, more than three-in-five Americans (63%, +4) and Canadians (62%, -8) think it is a good idea to add a disclaimer to explain that programs or movies are presented “as originally created” and “may contain outdated cultural depictions.”

One third of Canadians (33%, -1) say they always act “politically correct” because it’s the right thing to do. A larger proportion (43%, +3) claims to sometimes act “politically correct” because it’s the safe thing to do, while just 11% (=) do not act “politically correct” because it’s the wrong thing to do.

In the United States, a third of Americans (34%, +10) claim to always act “politically correct”, while a similar proportion (35%, -6) sometimes act “politically correct” and fewer than one-in-five (17%, -3) say they do not act “politically correct”.

About a third of Americans (37%) and Canadians (33%) believe comedians should “always” or “most of the time” behave in a “politically correct” way.

More than three-in-five residents in each of the two countries believe three groups in society should act in a “politically correct” manner “always” or “most of the time”: teachers (69% in Canada and 71% in the U.S.), politicians (67% in Canada and 66% in the U.S.) and journalists (62% in Canada and 64% in the U.S.).

Find our data tables for Canada here, data tables for the United States here and download the press release here.

Noise is Becoming a Bigger Problem Across Canada

July 14, 2025July 14, 2025By Mario Canseco

There is a sizeable increase in the proportion of Canadians who are unnerved by unnecessary noise from vehicles.

Vancouver, BC [July 14, 2025] – More than three-in-five Canadians appear dissatisfied with the level of noise intensity in their municipality, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 63% of Canadians say their city or town has become noisier over the past year, up nine points since a similar Research Co. poll conducted in May 2023.

More than two thirds of British Columbians (68%) and Ontarians (67%) say they live in a noisier city or town. The numbers are lower in Alberta (64%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (61%), Atlantic Canada (also 61%) and Quebec (56%).

Smaller proportions of Canadians believe their street (46%, +3) and their home (34%, +2) are noisier now than a year ago.

“Only 23% Canadians aged 55 and over say their home is noisier now than a year ago,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “The proportions are higher among their counterparts aged 18-to-34 (39%) and aged 35-to-54 (41%).”

As was the case in 2023, the occurrence that is most likely to bother Canadians at home is unnecessary noise from vehicles (such as motorcycles and cars revving up) (39%, +7), followed by dogs barking (35%, +5), a car alarm (34%, +12) and construction-related noises (such as roofing, land clearing and heavy machinery) (33%, +4).

More than two-in-five residents of Alberta (43%), Saskatchewan and Manitoba (42%) and Ontario (also 42%) were bothered by unnecessary noise from vehicles while at home. The proportions are lower in Atlantic Canada (38%), British Columbia (37%) and Quebec (35%).

Fewer than three-in-ten Canadians mention other noises that bothered them while at home, such as loud people outside (28%, +5), yard work (such as lawnmowers and leaf blowers) (26%, +6), yelling or screaming at a nearby home (24%, +4), loud music playing inside a vehicle (also 24%, +2), power tools (such as electric saws and sanders) (also 24%, +5), drivers honking the horn excessively (22%, +1), loud music at a nearby home (21%, =), a loud gathering or party at a nearby home (also 21%, +5), fireworks (20%, =), a home alarm (12%, +1) or cats meowing (8%, +1).

There is little fluctuation in the behaviour of Canadians to deal with noise, with 17% (+1) wearing earplugs to mitigate noise while inside their home, 11% (=) acquiring hardware, such as noise cancelling headphones or earphones, 8% (-1) reporting noise concerns to the police and 6% (=) moving away from their previous home because of noise.

Methodology: Results are based on an online survey conducted from June 17 to June 19, 2025, among 1,000 adults in Canada. The data has been statistically weighted according to Canadian census figures for age, gender and region in Canada. The margin of error—which measures sample variability—is +/- 3.1 percentage points, nineteen times out of twenty.

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.

Ruling Liberals Comfortably Ahead in Canada’s Political Scene

July 7, 2025July 7, 2025By Mario Canseco

Almost half of Liberal voters in 2025 are open to a merger with the New Democratic Party (NDP).

Vancouver, BC [July 7, 2025] – The governing Liberal Party remains the top choice for voters in Canada two and a half months after the last federal election, a new Research Co. poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample, 47% of decided voters in Canada say they would cast a ballot for the Liberal candidate in their constituency, while 37% would support the Conservative Party.

The New Democratic Party (NDP) and the Bloc Québécois are tied for third place with 6%, followed by the Green Party with 2% the People’s Party with 1% and other parties and independent candidates also with 1%.

The Liberals hold sizeable leads over the Conservatives in Atlantic Canada (57% to 38%), Ontario (53% to 41%) and British Columbia (52% to 37%). In Quebec, the Liberals are first with 46%, followed by the Conservatives with 21% and Bloc with 19%.

The Conservatives are ahead of the Liberals in Saskatchewan and Manitoba (48% to 42%) and Alberta (53% to 36%).

Canada-U.S. Relations is the most important issue for Canadians (22%, -4 since the final Research Co. poll of the 2025 federal campaign completed in late April), followed by the economy and jobs (21%, +1), housing, homelessness and poverty (18%, -3), health care (13%, +2) and immigration (9%, +2).

Just over three-in-five Canadians (61%, +2) approve of the way Prime Minister and Liberal leader Mark Carney is managing his duties. The rating is lower for Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre (44%, -4), Green co-leader Elizabeth May (34%), Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet (28%, -1), interim NDP leader Don Davies (26%) and People’s Party leader Maxime Bernier (21%, -1).

On the eve of the 2025 federal election, Carney held a 10-point lead over Poilievre on the “Preferred Prime Minister” question. This month, the Liberal leader is 16 points ahead of his Conservative counterpart (47% to 31%).

“Majorities of British Columbians (56%) and Ontarians (51%) prefer Mark Carney as Canada’s prime minister,” says Mario Canseco, President of Research Co. “Pierre Poilievre’s best numbers on this question are in Alberta (40%).”

At least half of Canadians believe Carney is better suited than Poilievre to handle three issues: Canada-U.S. Relations (53% to 28%), foreign affairs (52% to 28%) and national unity (50% to 26%).

The current prime minister holds double-digit leads over the Conservative leader on five other issues: the economy and jobs (49% to 33%), accountability and leadership (49% to 31%), health care (45% to 30%), the environment (43% to 27%) and energy and pipelines (42% to 34%).

Carney’s advantage over Poilievre is smaller on three issues: housing, homelessness and poverty (41% to 32%), immigration (40% to 34%) and crime and public safety (39% to 37%).

Federal NDP Leadership

The survey also asked Canadians about their views on nine possible contenders for the leadership of the federal NDP. The highest proportion of favourable mentions is for former House leader Ruth Ellen Brosseau (18%), followed by BC MP Jenny Kwan (17%), Alberta MP Heather McPherson (16%), former MP and former Vancouver Mayor Kennedy Stewart (also 16%), former BC MLA and MP Nathan Cullen (15%), Manitoba MP Leah Gazan (also 15%), former Ontario MP candidate Tony McQuail (also 15%), BC MP Gord Johns (14%) and former BC MP candidate Avi Lewis (12%).

When asked if they would like to see each of these candidates as leaders of the federal NDP, the highest proportion of “definitely” and “probably” responses is for Kwan (22%), followed by McPherson (21%), Stewart (20%), Cullen (also 20%), Brosseau (19%), McQuail (also 19%), Johns (18%), Lewis (also 18%) and Gazan (17%).

More than a third of Canadians (37%) think the federal NDP should merge with the Liberal Party—a view shared by 47% of those who voted for the Liberals in 2025 and 43% of those who voted for the New Democrats.

Public support is lower for mergers involving the NDP and the Green Party (30%) and the Liberals, New Democrats and Greens (also 30%).

Find our data tables here and download the press release here.